“sitetest, your recent postings are so far beneath you...”
Maybe you’ve just overestimated me. ;-)
“But for you to state that Rudy must go down to ‘ignominious defeat,’...”
In that Mr. Giuliani is trying to purge the party of social conservatives (or at least of social conservatism - he’s happy to take our votes as long as we keep our mouths shut), any defeat of the baby killer will be an ignominious defeat.
"I have to assume that this means ‘at the hands of a loathsome, criminal, Electoral College-abolishing, socialized medicine espousing, Communist military-loather,’ is to post the most moronic, unconservative crap ever posted on this board.”
You assume much. Rather, it will be at the hands of conservatives, real conservatives, who will refuse to vote for a liberal, whether he/she has an “R” or a “D” posted to his/her backside.
“You know who Hillary Clinton is...”
Better than many.
“...and you should be ashamed.”
Nah, not at all.
Rather, you should think again about voting for Mr. Giuliani, should he win the nomination (God forbid).
I saw the first Clinton administration up close and personal.
Yet, I believe that our nation would be more harmed by a Giuliani presidency than a second Clinton presidency. A Clinton presidency will be awful and difficult. But it is likely that stiffened Republican opposition will mitigate the damage that Mrs. Clinton does. A Giuliani presidency will likely achieve even more liberal results than a Clinton presidency, because the Republican Party finds it exceedingly difficult to resist the liberal inclinations of a Republican president.
And the Republican Party will be destroyed in the bargain.
When your house is burning down, try not burn down the fire station, too.
sitetest
I hope you like the new psychiatrist Hillary chooses for you.