I’m not a single-issue voter, either.
In fact, really, the only issue with which I have agreement with Mr. Giuliani is the war. Even then, I view him as fatally flawed in his ability to prosecute the war, but that’s another story.
Thus, voting FOR Mr. Giuliani would reduce me to a single-issue voter.
“If the far right stay home, and don’t vote, do you win anything?”
* chuckle *
It’s amusing that someone might lump me in with the “far right.” Some folks at FR have said that I’m not even a conservative at all.
In any event, if Mr. Giuliani is the Republican nominee, then conservatives will have already lost. Pretending otherwise would be foolish. It will be time to look to the future, to figure out how to minimize the current evil, and how to regroup for the future.
In my opinion, it will be important to make sure that Mr. Giuliani, baby-killer, goes down to ignominious defeat. Otherwise, the damage will be even greater.
sitetest
Rudy is a bad candidate, he is too socially liberal, and every Republican in this race besides Ron Paul would be better for this country.
But for you to state that Rudy must go down to "ignominious defeat," and I have to assume that this means "at the hands of a loathsome, criminal, Electoral College-abolishing, socialized medicine espousing, Communist military-loather," is to post the most moronic, unconservative crap ever posted on this board.
You know who Hillary Clinton is
* chuckle *
and you should be ashamed.