[Verginius Rufus]

I didn’t notice the 832. That’s about 100 years too late (Solomon’s death is put about 931...but the building of the temple would have been some years earlier).

[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

Kabbalistic non-standard chronology based on dividing history into three 2000 year blocks rather than the Deuterononical one of Kings and Chronicles (and archeology). And they have the Messianic age beginning in 240 A.D., no matter what Venerable Bede said.

http://www.barmitzva.org/Kabbalah/timeline.htm

[Zionist Conspirator]

I didn’t notice the 832. That’s about 100 years too late (Solomon’s death is put about 931...but the building of the temple would have been some years earlier).

Traditional Jewish chronology and standard secular chronology are actually at odds here. For example, conventional secular chronology places the destruction of the First Temple in 586BCE, while traditional Jewish chronology places it in 422BCE.

[Fedora]

Yes. According to 1 Kings (6:1, 6:38, 11:42), Solomon reigned 40 years and built the temple between the 4th and 11th years of his reign. There is some uncertainty about the exact date of Solomon’s reign, but by any estimate the article’s date is over a century off.