1. Don’t blame me. I voted for Tom McClintock (when he ran against Bustamante and Arnie)
2. I prefer Mitt. For you social conservatives (I’m an economic Conservative) Mitt is against gay marriage and abortion.
3. However, should Mitt not be the nominee, I WILL definitely, positively vote for Rudy, Fred or heck, even McCain or Huckabee. Any of them are far better than the alternative.
4. All of you social Conservatives, don’t bite off your nose to spite your face. Vote for the GOP nominee, period.
Whereas if Rudy won (and I don't think he can) he'd be a razor's edge win, a squeaker-win facing 2 houses packed with Democrats. Which way is he going to reach to get any political aims accomplished? Left, left, and left.
And then who will lead the charge to oppose his liberal policies? Nobody. We'll be in a country with two liberal parties, and the conservatives scattered like leaves in the wind.
You wouldn't even oppose his liberal policies now. After he should win, then you'd dig in your heels to resist?
I doubt it. I seriously doubt it.
” All of you social Conservatives, don’t bite off your nose to spite your face. Vote for the GOP nominee, period.”
I will not vote for anyone who supports abortion. It is the most horrible crime imaginable. Would you ask me to vote for someone who supports a constitutional right to molest children? No? But you WOULD ask me to vote for someone who supports a constitutional right to murder them? Do you see how sick that is? There are some crazy ideas coming out of these forums lately.
I not JUST a “Social Conservative”: I am more appropriate a Traditonalis, Smaller Government, and Ronald W. Reagan Conservative. The republican party is a tool; they own their power to ME, not the other-way around. They can shove it..when they nominate Rudy, or McCain or even Gov. ~Romney~ P!
“For you social conservatives (I’m an economic Conservative) Mitt is against gay marriage and abortion.”
Yeah, NOW he is.
“Vote for the GOP nominee, period.”
What if Hillary had an “R” after her name?