There will be no fewer babies killed in a Giuliani administration than in a Clinton administration. There is nothing in Giuliani’s long record to indicate that there is any material difference in policy stances or record in nominating judges than any classic Democratic pro-abortion candidate. A Giuliani presidency would not make a material difference in the number of abortions - it would, however, do long term damage to the Republican party and the principles that the party has historically stood for. Therefore, long term, his candidacy, whether he wins or loses, with cause much more damage to conservative efforts in many areas that most of us would agree on.
Short run maybe, but long run once you consider the Supreme Court nominees that the next president will get to make (most likely at least 2) and there will be a difference.
“A Giuliani presidency would not make a material difference in the number of abortions - it would, however, do long term damage to the Republican party and the principles that the party has historically stood for. Therefore, long term, his candidacy, whether he wins or loses, with cause much more damage to conservative efforts in many areas that most of us would agree on.”
How much damage will a Dem presidency, in particular if it is Hillary, do to fetuses. Are your concerns more for the long-term damage to the Pub Party as vs. the long-term (and permanent, such as dead) damage to untold numbers of increased aborted babies under a Dem administration?