“You’re promoting anti-gun pro-abortion Rudy in the wrong place, mister. Just ask Finman69”
It’s not a matter of being pro or anti-Rudy. That is immaterial to the question at hand. If you will not vote for Rudy regardless of your opinion of him, if he is the Pub Party’s choice for a candidate, will you be guaranteeing the increase in deaths of fetuses that will inevitably occur under a Dem administration? That is the question. You say you want to prevent abortion, while following a philosophy that is guaranteed to increase them. And as you believe everthing Guiliani says is a lie and that he will be the same as any of the Dem candidates, then discussing this subject rationally or logically with you becomes increasingly difficult. Answer the question, will your not voting for Rudy and therefore probably guaranteeing a Dem win in the elections doom many more fetuses to early termination under Dem policies? Stay on point here.
Regardless of it? Of course not. Because of his pro-abortion gungrabbing ways.
...will you be guaranteeing the increase in deaths of fetuses that will inevitably occur under a Dem administration?
Nope. The GOP will do that. If they nominate a pro-abortion gungrabber, they forfeit my vote, and the consequences of that action are theirs, not mine.
Bullshit. There will be no difference in the number of abortions under Giuliani or Clinton. Both want federal funding, neither understands Roe v. Wade is wrong, both call themselves pro-abortion.