“You obviously haven’t been reading the whole thread. No one believes this to be true - his record proves this out. This is the same smoke screen that Hannity has been trying to sell. Rudy will appoint the same judges that Hillary would - you are fooling no one. I very much doubt you even believe that - it just does not make sense. A pro-abortion politician who even stated he would pay for an abortion for his own daughter, will appoint judges that will overturn Roe?”
I have read the entire thread, including your comment above which totally ignores just about everything I was saying. Nothing you say above about whether Rudy is really telling the truth or not negates the ABSOLUTE result of allowing a Dem to be elected, which will be increased, not decreased, abortions, more abortion mills, more deaths of fetuses, and probably, if any of them had their way, a return to partial birth abortions. Do you want those results on your hands? Then don’t vote for Rudy if he ends up being the Pub candidate, and you will get just exactly what you claim you don’t want.
...precisely what he will get if he DOES vote for Rudy.
A very childish attempt to shame people into voting for an abortionist because he has an R behind his name. A Giuliani presidency would be much worse, since it would signal the end to the Republican party as a conservative party. It would be much more desirable to stand on the principles that have been the foundation of the Conservative party rather then succumb to the expediency of voting for a candidate that makes a mockery of conservative principles.