Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
"Which CANNOT be done without a pro-life president."

I think there is more too it than that. Regretably, Ronald Reagan, who we all love and adore, had 3 picks for the supreme court. 2 of the 3 were duds. Only Scalia is in favor of dumping R vs W. Kennedy has maintained restrictions but wont overturn R vs W. O'connor was a total dud.

GHWB, gave us Souter! A Lib-Pig and Thomas, so he was 50-50.

So there is no certainty that a pro life President will give us the Supreme Court we need.

If R vs W is overturned, it goes to the States. So, there are maybe 5 states that will outlaw it.

Abortion will continue in the millions for as far as the eye can see.

If (unborn)life is everything, as this thread is premising, then it will not be ended by voting pro-life. (I am pro-life and have always voted pro-life).

The holocaust will continue.

748 posted on 10/21/2007 12:47:32 PM PDT by blasater1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 681 | View Replies ]


To: blasater1960
So there is no certainty that a pro life President will give us the Supreme Court we need.

You are correct; however, there IS a certainty that a pro-abortion President WILL give us a pro-abortion justice.

For a multitude of reasons, it is almost impossible to discern whether a Supreme Court nominee is pro-life, but it is very simple to tell if they are pro-abortion.

750 posted on 10/21/2007 12:50:39 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 748 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson