Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Natural Law
The popular interpretation is that it is a "privacy" issue, but what the ruling really said is that the federal government has no rights to get involved in it.

Umm, so the Supreme Court is NOT a part of the federal government? Do tell!

1,161 posted on 10/23/2007 3:07:21 AM PDT by Tabi Katz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 989 | View Replies ]


To: Tabi Katz

The SCOTUS asserted that abortion was an extension of martial privacy as decided in Griswold v. Connecticut. In doing so it ruled that the federal government had no authority to act on the matter.


1,190 posted on 10/23/2007 4:10:57 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1161 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson