To: Man50D
Those who oppose Giuliani disagree with and hate socialism regardless of party affiliation. I think you're confused. If Rudy was a socialist, then socialists such as the NYTimes and Hollywood would support him, but they do not.
257 posted on
10/20/2007 2:41:49 PM PDT by
narby
To: narby
I think you're confused. If Rudy was a socialist, then socialists such as the NYTimes and Hollywood would support him, but they do not.
You fail to realize those socialist rags don't so because they realize he wouldn't stand a chance as their endorsement would remove any veneer of conservatism Giuliani appears to possess. By not saying a word Giuliani still has the appearance of a conservative even though he has socialist roots and possibly be the GOP nominee. It would guarantee a socialist in the White House if he were to run against Clinton.
357 posted on
10/20/2007 4:51:17 PM PDT by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: narby
If Rudy was a socialist, then socialists such as the NYTimes and Hollywood would support him That's like saying Hillary isn't a socialist because Oprah and most of Hollywood like Obama better.
358 posted on
10/20/2007 4:52:23 PM PDT by
Ol' Sparky
(Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson