Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ol' Sparky
A liberal Republican does far more damage than liberal Democrat.

Pure stupid BS. The presidency is the total sum of the administration, not one man. A Republican presidency will empower the Republican party, bringing Republican judges and helping Republican congressional candidates.. A Democrat presidency the opposite.

Anything other than supporting and voting for the Republican party is helping Hillary. That's just the facts.

18 posted on 10/20/2007 11:06:31 AM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: narby; Ol' Sparky
A liberal Republican does far more damage than liberal Democrat.

Pure stupid BS.

Sparky's comment is HARDLY BS. In fact, it is RIGHT ON THE MARK!!

As I say ad nauseum on here...

Liberal Republicans like Giuliani are MUCH MORE DANGEROUS than liberal democrats,,,

because LIBERAL Republicans like Rudy BLUR THE DISTINCTION between conservatism and liberalism,,,

MAKING LIBERALISM MUCH MORE ACCEPTABLE!!!!

To borrow your words, "THAT'S JUST THE FACTS"!

22 posted on 10/20/2007 11:15:30 AM PDT by stockstrader (We need a conservative who will ENERGIZE the Party, not a liberal who will DEMORALIZE it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: narby
Pure stupid BS. The presidency is the total sum of the administration, not one man. A Republican presidency will empower the Republican party, bringing Republican judges and helping Republican congressional candidates..

You frankly forget the core, and you conveniently skip the campaign process.

Most of the grassroots manpower (especially in the South) comes from anti-Rudy Republicans. Whereas, a majority of these folks (probably a bare majority at that) might be able to be arm-twisted into voting for Rudy, the fact is that the rest of what's needed for the Republican bandwagon won't be there...the volunteers will tend to evaporate and & $ raised will pale in comparison to the Dems.

Empower? Well, if you think "anemic" is empowering...

23 posted on 10/20/2007 11:18:12 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: narby
A Republican presidency will empower the Republican party

But, liberal Republican will not only not empower conservatives, but will move the party to left.

A liberal Republican is much more likely to get liberal legislation passed than a liberal Democrat. Republicans are much more likely to resist liberal legislation pushed for by a Democrat than a Republican like Giuliani.

A liberal Republican President guarantees no conservative in the White House until 2016.

The election of Giuliani all but guarantees the GOP has no chance of taking back Congress for a decade. The party in the White House almost always loses seats in Congress over the course of a Presidency. That will be especially true of Giuliani reaches office and drives conservative southerners back to conservative Democrats in Congress. Meanwhile, a Hillary Clinton Presidency could result in Republicans gaining back Congress by 2010.

Voting for a liberal results in liberalism. If you too stupid to understand that, you deserve everything that will occur. I don't want to see people like you whine about it if Giuliani is unelectable or if he reaches office and betrays something you believe in. You've been warned of the consequences.

30 posted on 10/20/2007 11:26:11 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: narby
Threads like this really bring out the Conservative Taliban.

The Conservative Taliban will get Hill-Bill Klinton elected.

Rudy isnt my guy by far but Hill-Bill-2 WILL destroy whats left of our Nation. We cant allow that.

83 posted on 10/20/2007 12:21:27 PM PDT by blasater1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: narby

“The presidency is the total sum of the administration, not one man. A Republican presidency will empower the Republican party, bringing Republican judges and helping Republican congressional candidates”

I notice you throw around the word “Republican” a lot, but I don’t see the word “Conservative” anywhere in your post.


104 posted on 10/20/2007 12:33:20 PM PDT by Grunthor (http://franz.org/quiz.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: narby

You are 100% correct.


188 posted on 10/20/2007 1:46:28 PM PDT by Riptides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson