Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo

“The captions are not up to date.”

You’re right - Just how do you label someone who cut a deal to tell the truth in exchange for immunity “cleared” ?


80 posted on 10/20/2007 8:11:08 AM PDT by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: RS

You can take your nasty crap and shove it, RS.


81 posted on 10/20/2007 8:17:15 AM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: RS

Why would anyone need to make a deal to tell the truth?

It was not a plea deal because Dela Cruz did not admit guilt.

Gen Mattis has said there was not sufficient evidence to charge Dela Cruz and so charges were dropped.

You can speculate that Gen Mattis is lying, that charges were dropped against Dela Cruz in exchange for him to change his testimony again. But I’d rather deal with the facts as I find them. Speculation without proof doesn’t get us anywhere.


84 posted on 10/20/2007 8:31:56 AM PDT by RedRover (DefendOurMarines.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson