Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Drew68
If Clinton wins, the social conservatives can sit back and say, with valid conviction, that the Republicans lost because the GOP did not run a conservative candidate.

Bullhockey. The above shows a total ignorance or a total disregard (I don't know which) of/for the primary system. To think that we could win nationally with a candidate who can't even win a primary is absolutely insane. Whoever wins the primary is the strongest candidate, period, end of story. If you can't convince your own party to vote for you in the primary, how in the world could possibly hope to convince anyone outside of the party to vote for you? Think about that for a minute.

52 posted on 10/18/2007 5:23:23 PM PDT by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Melas
Think about that for a minute.

Oh, I have. Here's what I think. Guiliani is going to win the Republican nomination. He is the strongest candidate. Sure, he isn't doing so hot among FReepers but out there in the real world a lot of people like this guy. With the primaries right around the corner, nobody else seems to be getting much traction. Now whose fault is it that the current Republican frontrunner doesn't appeal to Christian conservatives --a core Republican constituency? I think this says more about the waning political influence of the religious right than it does about the GOP.

Now, if Guiliani is trounced by Clinton, the blame will be placed on the fact that Guiliani did not appeal to the social conservative base. If Guiliani wins the presidency? Well... That changes everything.

60 posted on 10/18/2007 5:43:49 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson