What is in dispute here factually? Can you be specific in your analysis or is this just bias or your part because you can’t handle bad news?
Here's a quote from the article. If you don't see this as a biased rant, I'm not going to waste time arguing with you.
Let us hope we have seen the last of a "vice" president and former CEO of Halliburton who - despite his lack of military service and five draft deferments - can unabashedly bang the drums of war and, while pulling the puppet strings, ultimately profit from all the death and destruction our unnecessary excursion into Iraq has wrought. He should remember, someday when he goes to his ultimate judgment, he can't take a single war profiteer's dime with him.
Bush and Cheney have failed to get results with the war and the borders—and now the latest I’m hearing is they are going to be putting Marine Colonel Chessani on trial over the Haditha mess—Chessani wasn’t even there!
You can call it a rant but let’s see how the troops feel when one of their good combatant commanders goes on trial!
This corruption in the Dept of Defense-—You call it a rant, but WE call it bad news for the US of A! Were’s your loyalty Sarge-—To the rule of law and the US Constitution or to the temporary occupants of office? It’s time for you to take your brown snout out of the leadership’s butt Sarge.