To: george76
And just how safe is Hastert’s district?
3 posted on
10/18/2007 8:43:15 AM PDT by
Cosmo
(Liberalism is for girls)
To: Cosmo
I believe it is the coservative part of IL. Northern and deep south are the liberal terretories. Not sure about his district, but it has largely gone republican by a significant majority in the past.
4 posted on
10/18/2007 8:45:50 AM PDT by
Tenacious 1
(No to nitwit jesters with a predisposition of self importance and unqualified political opinions!)
To: Cosmo; Clintonfatigued
Republicans would be expected to win a general election, but a special election could create special problems for the GOP....
5 posted on
10/18/2007 8:46:42 AM PDT by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: Cosmo
very safe ... rebuplican, republican, republican
32 posted on
10/18/2007 9:05:48 AM PDT by
Thomas Jefferson II
(If we could harness the energy from our fore-fathers spinning in their graves)
To: Cosmo
And just how safe is Hastert’s district? Very.
51 posted on
10/18/2007 9:29:54 AM PDT by
Non-Sequitur
(Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
To: Cosmo
Hastert’s district has had a huge influx of illegal aliens. It is probable that a lot of them are also now illegal voters because of motor voter and hispanic organizing campaigns.
It is a process that is being seen in a lot of new areas.
Illegals in northern Virginia, actively recruited and registered by La Raza and LULAC and MeCHa made the difference in Webb’s 9000 vote victory over Allen.
Election fraud by illegals is one of American politics’ dirty little secrets, and Republican candidates can’t do much about it without being labelled as racists.
53 posted on
10/18/2007 9:34:11 AM PDT by
oldbill
To: Cosmo
“And just how safe is Hastert’s district?”
Safe for what? big government spenders like Hastert?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson