[redgirlinabluestate]

You are right. He is the best candidate and he did govern conservatively. And, perhaps saying that we should withdraw our support permanently from that ridiculous human rights council is obvious, but thank goodness someone is saying it.

Rebuttal to falsehoods posted on this thread:
Romney in Massachusetts was fighting upstream against raging left-wing rapids. This could explain why John J. Miller, the national political reporter of National Review, has written that “a good case can be made that Romney has fought harder for social conservatives than any other governor in America, and it is difficult to imagine his doing so in a more daunting political environment.”

Massachusetts Citizens For Life Executive Director Marie Sturgis: "Having Governor Romney in the corner office for the last four years has been one of the strongest assets the pro-life movement has had in Massachusetts." (Kathryn Jean Lopez, "An Early Massachusetts Primary," National Review, 1/10/07)

Massachusetts Citizens For Life Pioneer Valley Chapter Chairman Kevin Jourdain: "Mitt Romney was a great Governor, who served with honor and distinction. But most importantly, he was a pro-life Governor. He vetoed a number of pro-abortion pieces of legislation and made many pro-life appointments. He was always there for us." (Kevin Jourdain, Remarks, Agawam, MA, 5/10/07)

[EternalVigilance]

He is the best candidate and he did govern conservatively.

I'll restrain my laughter, and ask you why then he implemented gay marriage, signed socialized medicine complete with taxpayer-funded abortions, signed a permanent "assault" weapons ban, and thoroughly homosexualized the public schools? How can you describe that as "governing conservatively"?

[dynachrome]

A little more ammo on Mitt. (IF he continues to diss the whole UN and not just part of it, I will take a look at supporting him. Not at this time)