Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 10/18/2007 9:14:09 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator, reason:

Duplicate:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1913051/posts



Skip to comments.

Sandy Berger and the Real Hillary Clinton [But is anybody paying attention?]
RealClearPolitics.com ^ | 18 Oct 2007 | Ronald A. Cass

Posted on 10/18/2007 8:34:46 AM PDT by snarks_when_bored


Return to the Article

October 18, 2007

Sandy Berger and the Real Hillary Clinton

By

Ronald A. Cass

Elections are not just about platforms but character.

[snip]

According to reports in Newsweek, The Washington Post, and other liberal news media not commonly associated with a "vast right wing conspiracy," Hillary Clinton has selected a team of national security advisers led by the "triumvirate" of Madeline Albright, Richard Holbrooke, and Sandy Berger. All three were prominent members of Bill Clinton's national security team when he was president. Ms. Albright was President Clinton's Secretary of State. Mr. Holbrooke was U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations. And Mr. Berger was President Clinton's National Security Advisor. While conservatives generally give them negative reviews, all three have substantial experience, close ties to the senator and her husband, and are exactly the sort of "old hands" who become key insiders in a campaign.

Except for one small detail. Sandy Berger isn't just a former National Security Advisor - he's also the only National Security Advisor in U.S. history to be convicted after stealing and destroying classified documents.

[snip]

In Sandy Berger's case, there is no excuse. Hillary's inclusion of Sandy Berger in her circle of advisers demonstrates that, notwithstanding her law license, she really doesn't care about the law. She doesn't care whether someone violates the law if they're on her team, if the violation in some way helps the Clintons. Hillary's indifference to criminal wrong-doing suggests that she sees herself as above the law, breezily ignoring law when it's an impediment to something she wants.

[snip]

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: badjudgment; hillaryclinton; sandyberger; scofflaw
Will more than half of our fellow citizens choose Hillary Rodham Clinton to be the first female President of the United States? If she's the best available woman for the job, there's little hope for all of us.
1 posted on 10/18/2007 8:34:48 AM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
“So, what does it say that Hillary Clinton chose Mr. Berger as one of her advisers, and that she will rely on the advice of a convicted criminal who is barred from access to the sort of national security information a party’s candidate for President is routinely briefed on during a campaign?”

Maybe Sandy make her an offer she couldn’t refuse? Maybe she didn’t CHOOSE him...maybe HE CHOSE the position!

2 posted on 10/18/2007 8:46:27 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Stay together, pay the soldiers and forget everything else." Lucius Septimus Severus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
She doesn't care whether someone violates the law if they're on her team, if the violation in some way helps the Clintons.

That would include her husband. Just another member of the criminal enterprise known as the Clintons.

3 posted on 10/18/2007 8:47:37 AM PDT by patj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Didn’t the Clinton’s have a cat named “Socks?” Does that make Sandy Burgler the Clinton’s pu**y?


4 posted on 10/18/2007 8:48:09 AM PDT by feedback doctor (green is the new red. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

The one thing that amazes me is that Democrats are looking at just winning. They don’t think about the effect it’s going to have on them. They don’t seem to realize how much power that Hillary wants. They don’t realize that she will tax them to death and give them communism in return. Hillary and especially her husband are the biggest embarrassment to this country that we have ever had. If Hillary gets elected, we will have a minimal military. The military will not serve her and they will leave. Can we afford this?


5 posted on 10/18/2007 8:53:36 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
Will more than half of our fellow citizens choose Hillary Rodham Clinton to be the first female President of the United States?

Thanks to H. Ross Perot, it only took 43% of our fellow citizens to elect BJ Clinton.

6 posted on 10/18/2007 9:00:41 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

This is just the Clintons repaying Sandy Burglar for taking the fall while destroying documents related to Iraq and Al Qaeda. “You destroy the evidence and we’ll take care of you - no worries”. Was it just coincidence that Sandy’s clearance can be reinstated after the next election - I don’t think so. Disgusting.


7 posted on 10/18/2007 9:01:31 AM PDT by SpitfyrAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: snarks_when_bored
If she's the best available woman for the job, there's little hope for all of us.

That statement speaks volumes about what may be in store for the rest of us when that vast left-wing, tatooed, earringed, unwashed mass leaves the polling places.

If that carpetbagging marxist is elected and she opens the door for that evil carcass she is nominally wedded to....we're in deep doo-doo!

9 posted on 10/18/2007 9:07:19 AM PDT by fweingart (Tom Tancredo Will Get The Job Done! (How is Mumia Abu-Jamal these days?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2
The military will not serve her and they will leave. Can we afford this?
Will there be any SS agents willing to take a bullet for her, after the way she treated them during the first two terms?
10 posted on 10/18/2007 9:08:22 AM PDT by Sig Sauer P220
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson