Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court Clears Senator Clinton in Donor Lawsuit
NY Sun ^ | October 16, 2007 | JOSH GERSTEIN

Posted on 10/16/2007 3:42:04 PM PDT by SwankyC

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: doug from upland
Apparently you don’t realize how important it is that this woman is going to finally be under oath.

But remember how she skated the last time she had to testify: "I don't recall." I mean, what are you gonna do when you have a witness under oath who claims amnesia, selective or not? They can't put her in a brain scanner or memory recall device. If she lies about not remembering, all the questioner can do is point out how obvious all the things are that she can't remember, and how a reasonable person, much less "the smartest woman who ever walked the Earth", would have no trouble recalling the events or circumstances.

For people like us, it would then be obvious that Hillary! is lying. But that's because we are, for the most part, at least semi-intelligent people. We can connect the dots and make reasonable inferences based on reason and logic. I'm not sure the same could be said of an average sampling of the electorate. There is still a strong undertow of Clintonophilia out there. People are going to shrug off Hillary's denials and amnesia, and vote for her anyway, for whatever stupid reason they might have (i.e., "to have Bill back", or "it would be nice to have a woman in charge").

61 posted on 10/17/2007 5:29:46 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: chimera

This is the kind of thing we are going to show to the public to show them that she is lying. http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZY2b3Db3dGE


62 posted on 10/17/2007 6:23:52 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Apparently you don’t realize how important it is that this woman is going to finally be under oath.

It isn't important. Jim Rob was right when he said that the liberal court will protect these scum bags. The system is so far gone that I am willing to wager that NOTHING will come of this.

Even if the scandal is made public enough for everyone to hear about it, the electorate is so stupid she has a viable chance of getting elected anyway.

63 posted on 10/17/2007 8:06:58 AM PDT by SwankyC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SwankyC

Then I guess we can count on you to sit on your butt and just keep typing away and complaining. Some people are really good at that. Actually trying to do something takes some effort.


64 posted on 10/17/2007 8:40:00 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

I’m not a lawyer, so you expect me to do what?


65 posted on 10/17/2007 8:48:02 AM PDT by SwankyC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

At least the media hacks do it over ideology, these guys did it for money.


The media hacks do it for the money. Money and Power.
If it was for ideology, the media hacks would be using their own brains instead of regurgitating the lies they are fed.

As far as Peter Paul et al. , there is no doubt they also were doing it for the money.

Prosecution and incarceration of many of the large figures in organized crime were only possible because of the ‘stooges’ who were turned and testified against their previous ‘masters’.

The same is being done here. The ‘righteous’ have nothing they can testify about to use to prosecute the Clintons.

So, the only choice, in your view, is to let them get away with it because the witnesses are not angels???????


66 posted on 10/17/2007 9:25:19 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (- Attention all planets of the solar Federation--Secret plan codeword: Banana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Dloug, I love ya like a brother but mone of this stopped them from helping the clintons to 4 more years in the White House.

How could anyone, with the ideological pedigree you listed (et tu Reagan?), consciously help these criminals anywhere, anytime?

I don’t get it.


67 posted on 10/17/2007 11:46:31 AM PDT by Bob J (sis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Dloug, I love ya like a brother but mone of this stopped them from helping the clintons to 4 more years in the White House.

How could anyone, with the ideological pedigree you listed (et tu Reagan?), consciously help these criminals anywhere, anytime?

I don’t get it.


68 posted on 10/17/2007 11:46:38 AM PDT by Bob J (sis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Doug,
This is interesting but very confusing. Are these folks conservative or what? They seem to be friends with Reagan, Carter, and the Clintons from what has been posted. I guess basically these guys gave them a party and Hillary did not mention it. Is that pretty much the deal?


69 posted on 10/17/2007 12:16:45 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Do you have a link to the court’s decision?


70 posted on 10/17/2007 12:21:33 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SwankyC

I guess I don’t expect you to do anything. Others have pledged to contact the media and send the video to everyone they know, but for some I know they can’t make that kind of monumental commitment.

Hillary’s hacks are going to suppress this info and try to convince everyone that NOTHING will ever happen. It might be nice if you didn’t join her by trying to convince people that NOTHING will ever happen. But that’s your choice.


71 posted on 10/17/2007 7:06:37 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Sending a video damning a liberal to liberal media is akin to pissing up a rope and I dont have an umbrella.


72 posted on 10/18/2007 8:13:48 AM PDT by SwankyC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Sending a video damning a liberal to liberal media is akin to pissing up a rope and I dont have an umbrella.


73 posted on 10/18/2007 8:13:57 AM PDT by SwankyC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SwankyC

I don’t expect you do to anything, but as someone who is ostensibly on our side, it really would be nice if you don’t try to sabotage this. Please, just don’t do anything.


74 posted on 10/18/2007 8:24:37 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

FReepmail your email and I can send you the PDF.


75 posted on 10/18/2007 8:42:56 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson