Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coverage From The Inside of The MA-05 Special Election
Hub Politics ^ | 10/16/07 | Rob Willington

Posted on 10/16/2007 3:31:56 PM PDT by No Dog

Tonight we could see a Republican elected to Congress from Massachusetts. Rob Willington, the executive director of the Massachusetts Republican Party is covering Election Day from the inside... Check it out and be the first to find out what's happening in this historic election!


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: fifthdistrict; jimogonowski; ma05; nikitsongas; ogonowski; specialelection; tsongas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Clintonfatigued

There were a number of stories about Tsongas being a less than effective candidate and that Democrat bigwigs like Bill Clinton had to fly in to campaign for her. There’s been mumblings that she might be in trouble.


21 posted on 10/16/2007 6:19:49 PM PDT by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief (Groundchuck Hagel and Lindsey Grahamcracker are undesirable menu items in 2008. Make new choices!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Galactic Overlord-In-Chief

Latest news, per hubpolitics.com:

Jim Ogonowski:37,685 (48%)
Niki Tsongas: 39,099 (49%)
AP calls it for Tsongas


22 posted on 10/16/2007 6:20:58 PM PDT by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief (Groundchuck Hagel and Lindsey Grahamcracker are undesirable menu items in 2008. Make new choices!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

From the Hub:

Jim Ogonowski:37,685 (48%)
Niki Tsongas: 39,099 (49%)
AP calls it for Tsongas


23 posted on 10/16/2007 6:21:01 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Galactic Overlord-In-Chief

No surprise the leftist AP would call it for the rodent before they’re done counting. I see no percentage to accompany that figure. It looks like it’s about 65-70% of the precincts.


24 posted on 10/16/2007 6:22:58 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

At the very least, Jim Ogonowski is our Paul Hackett.


25 posted on 10/16/2007 6:23:20 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

I got some numbers:

As of 9:15 p.m., with 168 of 195 precincts - 86 percent, the results were:

x-Nicola Tsongas, Dem 46,542 - 51 percent
Jim Ogonowski, GOP 41,508 - 46 percent
Patrick Murphy, Ind 1,428 - 2 percent
Kurt Hayes, Ind 970 - 1 percent
Kevin Thompson, CST 429 - 0 percent


26 posted on 10/16/2007 6:24:29 PM PDT by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief (Groundchuck Hagel and Lindsey Grahamcracker are undesirable menu items in 2008. Make new choices!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj

Wow, that is surprising.


27 posted on 10/16/2007 6:27:01 PM PDT by darkangel82 (All right! Let's go Tribe!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Galactic Overlord-In-Chief

He won’t be able to overcome that figure. If the % holds, my figure that he’d win 45% would be off by a single percent. A disappointing margin for the rodents in a heavy rodent district, and a narrow victory for moonbat hate.


28 posted on 10/16/2007 6:27:17 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
At the very least, Jim Ogonowski is our Paul Hackett.

Yeah. Looks like the margin may be as close as the Hackett race was. Still, think the MSM will say this close race portends trouble for the Democrats come 2008? Heh heh.
29 posted on 10/16/2007 6:27:43 PM PDT by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief (Groundchuck Hagel and Lindsey Grahamcracker are undesirable menu items in 2008. Make new choices!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

Scroll down. Niki Ticks on ass won.


30 posted on 10/16/2007 6:27:56 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Galactic Overlord-In-Chief

er, scratch that, darn. But it’s not over quite yet. Even if Tsongas wins, it will still be close.


31 posted on 10/16/2007 6:28:47 PM PDT by darkangel82 (All right! Let's go Tribe!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82; fieldmarshaldj; LdSentinal

I think that this shows, more than anything else, the effectiveness of the border security issue. If it can make headway in MA, it’s a winning issue everywhere.


32 posted on 10/16/2007 6:30:35 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I agree. I wasn’t expecting a win here, but at least we tried. 46% is a good showing for the GOP in MA.


33 posted on 10/16/2007 6:32:14 PM PDT by darkangel82 (All right! Let's go Tribe!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Thank you for keeping me informed. It looks like we lost this one but we can hold our heads high tonight still.

BTW, why do democrats always take the lead at the end?


34 posted on 10/16/2007 6:34:07 PM PDT by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

Don’t know.

I still haven’t lost all hopes of ousting John Kerry in 2005. He’s also not a popular figure there.


35 posted on 10/16/2007 6:35:13 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

TYPO!!!

I meant 2008.


36 posted on 10/16/2007 6:35:36 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

‘cause dey do da countin’...


37 posted on 10/16/2007 6:40:03 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Better than I had hoped. Much better.

Onward to Louisiana on Saturday.

38 posted on 10/16/2007 6:44:30 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Jindal?


39 posted on 10/16/2007 6:45:45 PM PDT by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

Yup. And hopefully we’ll pick off some vulnerable statewide rodents, too (and pick up one or both of the legislative bodies for the first time in over 135 years).


40 posted on 10/16/2007 6:48:32 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson