Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mnehrling

You keep posting that crap over and over when you know that the reason he voted against some of these “conservative” bills is because they were most likely poisoned by riders.

I find it very dishonest that you just say he voted against this or that without naming specific bills so that people can look at them and make up their own minds.

Name the specific bills or quiet down.


55 posted on 10/16/2007 6:36:10 AM PDT by t_skoz ("let me be who I am - let me kick out the jams!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: t_skoz
You keep posting that crap over and over when you know that the reason he voted against some of these “conservative” bills is because they were most likely poisoned by riders.

You keep saying that over and over and over.. guess what, symbolism over substance is all Paul is about.. the bill numbers have been posted over and over and are available at the links included. This is just a sampling.. maybe I'll go back to on the issues and update the list.. I'm sure people will love to see Paul voting against condemning Iran (along with his pal Kucinich) or supporting David Obey's War Tax proposal... yea, real Conservative.

How about Paul voting against giving Ronald Reagen the medal of freedom, with the excuse that it isn't in the Constitution, but not having a problem co-sponsoring bills to give similar honors to baseball players and radio dj's in his district.

Or how about Ron Paul earmarking $13Million for the TransTexas corridor (NAU/NAFTA Highway) project? That one has really turned off a lot of folks here in Texas.

57 posted on 10/16/2007 6:41:37 AM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson