Replies

"It's a lot easier to call him a name than argue against his positions."

Maybe for some, but I don't mind commenting on his stance on isolationism.

I don't think he has the methodology on how we can restore our country. History's clock cannot be set back that far. He has not given us any practical solutions on how to go about getting back to a gold standard. How would he do that?

And how would he go about defeating our current enemy without sending our military abroad? I don't think I want to be receiving pot shots from the enemy from outside our borders for the next fifty years.

Doesn't he think that extra-ordinary warfare must be fought using extra-ordinary methods which require sending our troops and military might abroad? I'm pretty sure if he is elected he'll change his mind very quickly. Especially if he has to walk around using a dosimeter.

History's clock cannot be set back that far.

Dear fellow FReeper, thank you for your voice of reason. Some other FReepers here display way too little appreciation for war, taxes and corruption.

Doesn't he think that extra-ordinary warfare must be fought using extra-ordinary methods...

He's suggested using the constitution's authorization of marque & reprisal. I don't know if that's adequate, but it is extra-ordinary.