It’s not “entirely false.” That is the spirit of Roe v. Wade. There are minor, entirely negligible exceptions like parental notification and partial birth abortion, which could even be described as non-exceptions. Parental notification applies only to minors. Obviously, a minor has no right to make every decision for herself. But that doesn’t mean she doesn’t have a right to abortion. It just means she’s got to give notification to the person who is legally entitled to make these decisions. As far as partial birth abortion is concerned, I’m not sure I would even call it abortion. More like infanticide.
“It’s not “entirely false.” That is the spirit of Roe v. Wade.”
Lol. Good one. I feel like I’m debating political issues with a liberal. Sir, you said it’s holding is that abortion cannot be regulated. It’s explicit text says the opposite. Precedent for 30 yrs demonstrates the opposite. I’m sorry but saying it’s holding is that abortion CAN’T be regulated is false and all the spin in a democrat’s speech isn’t going to change that.
The spirt of it. Are you conjuring spirits now like liberal judges? lol.
You keep focusing on one of several regulations at the exclusion of the others, let alone the opinion’s express text, and you’re really stretching. Some “minor” regulation no matter how you slice it is contrary to “NO REGULATION.” As a final point on the parental notification issue, why do you think the legislature passed this law in the first place? Why do you insult the efforts of pro life advocates who got this put in place? This was done to discourage abortion, which it does, and which is why pro abortion people fought/fight it strenuously.