Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant
They don’t seem to comprehend that Roe v. Wade stands for the proposition that abortion CAN’T be regulated.

I thought R v W outlawed third trimester abortions, no?

26 posted on 10/15/2007 5:12:38 PM PDT by Go Gordon (The short fortune teller who escaped from prison was a small medium at large.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Go Gordon
I thought R v W outlawed third trimester abortions, no?

No, it ruled that states could restrict 3rd trimester abortions provided they weren't necessary to protect the woman's health. Subsequent decisions ruled that this exception had to include "mental health," which in effect makes it impossible to outlaw 3rd trimester abortions, since it's very easy to claim an abortion is necessary for "mental health."

28 posted on 10/15/2007 5:15:18 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Go Gordon

Second and third. But now it has been expanded to the point where it covers everything up to and including the moment of birth, with the partial birth abortion decisions.


32 posted on 10/15/2007 5:19:11 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Go Gordon

Pardon me... It did not “prohibit” second and third trimester abortions. It merely said that the goverment could not regulate abortions in the first trimester.


33 posted on 10/15/2007 5:20:14 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson