Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First baby boomer applies for Social Security
AP via Houston Chronicle ^ | 10/15/07 | AP

Posted on 10/15/2007 2:18:55 PM PDT by trumandogz

WASHINGTON — The nation's first baby boomer applied for Social Security benefits today, signaling the start of an expected avalanche of applications from the post World War II war generation.

Kathleen Casey-Kirschling, a former teacher from New Jersey, applied for benefits over the Internet at an event attended by Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue. Casey-Kirschling, who now lives in Maryland, was born one second after midnight on Jan. 1, 1946, making her the first baby boomer — a generation of nearly 80 million born from 1946 to 1964, Astrue said.

Casey-Kirschling will be eligible for benefits after she turns 62 next year.

An estimated 10,000 people a day will become eligible for Social Security benefits over the next two decades, Astrue said.

The Social Security trust fund, if left alone, is projected to go broke in 2041, though Astrue said he hopes Congress will address the issue, perhaps after the 2008 presidential election.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: babyboomers; boomers; genx; greedygeezers; socialsecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-193 next last
To: Paleo Conservative

United States
There is some disagreement as to the exact beginning and end dates of the baby boom, but the range most commonly accepted is as starting in 1946 and ending in 1964.[2][3][4] The problem with this definition is that this period may be too long for a cultural generation, even though it covers a time of increased births. If the gross number of births were the indicator, births began to decline from the peak in 1957 (4,300,000), but fluctuated or did not decline by much more than 40,000 (1959-1960) to 60,000 (1962-1963) until a sharp decline from 1960 (4,027,490) to 1965 (3,760,358). This makes 1964 a good year to mark the end of the baby boom in the U.S.[5]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_boomer

Maybe you are a SHADOW BOOMER?

In his book Boomer Nation, Steve Gillon states that the baby boom began in 1946 and ends in 1960, but he breaks Baby Boomers into two groups: Boomers, born between 1945 and 1957; and Shadow Boomers born between 1958 and 1964.[6]


21 posted on 10/15/2007 2:35:58 PM PDT by avacado (Republicans Destroyed Democrats' Most Cherished Institution: SLAVERY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

I turned 62 in August. I applied in May, got my first check October 3rd. Now, if you think Motor Vehicle operations are bad, just wait until you deal with the SS folks.

I had to apply a second time, the old biddy didn’t know she had to hit “enter” and “save”, for my information to be in the system. Then, after all of this, you will get the final appointment via telephone. Still scratching my head about this issue.


22 posted on 10/15/2007 2:36:13 PM PDT by Capt_Hank (btu's...kcal's...to kJ's, but my activation energy is still high.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

My parents were married on VJ-Day and I issued forth nine months later. I have a better claim to “First Boomer” than does she. So there.


23 posted on 10/15/2007 2:38:35 PM PDT by Snickersnee (Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illuminatas

If you’re paranoid, you’re not alone. I fully expect that those of us who planned for retirement will be screwed as the government panders to those who couldn’t be bothered.


24 posted on 10/15/2007 2:39:43 PM PDT by Hoffer Rand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US

There is no trust fund - just IOUs promising to tax the living bejabbers out of everyone.


25 posted on 10/15/2007 2:40:48 PM PDT by achilles2000 (Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_boomer

"I resent being lumped together with them."

yes, you're such a much better person than any of those 80 million people because you were born whenever you were born rather than when someone else was born. It has nothing to do with your actions or character or acts of charity or how you raised your kids. It's totally about when you're born. Except on the "I hate *insert state name here* threads". Then it's about where you live. That's the over-riding decision maker on what a great person you are on those threads. In fact, I've discovered over the years that if you were born in 1972 and live in Independence Missouri, you're practically of royal lineage. We should all simply toss our old California born butts into the ocean so there is pleeenty of yummy food and drink and cushy cushions for you because you are a better person since you weren't born at the time I was or live in a state with a coastline! That way the retirement plan some other generation waaaayyyyyy before ours came up with that is failing will be obeekee kadobeekee until you are ready to draw from it. Who cares if those 80 million people were REQUIRED to pay into it! Who CARES if they had little or even NO warning that there was a problem! Why didn't that 58 year old preschool teacher slash maintenance man know better?? They deserve to work. Better yet! All people who were born whenever or wherever you care to place the marker get to work an extra 25 years or until they die because all they have contributed to society has been, oh, the internet, a man on the moon, medical advances, little crap. So much less than the brilliant 18 year olds we have today. Specially that gem I saw this morning outside the donut shop pickin' his nose and smokin' a Winston wearing a bandana. Yeppers. Makes TONS of sense....../sarc

Note to self: add boomer threads to the deadly (stupid) thread list you want to avoid at all cost.

Here's a thought. 70 BILLION dollars every year is spent on illegal aliens. Rather than kicking working Americans around because of when they were born, how about we kick out CRIMINALS who weren't born here AT ALL???? That'll certainly solve the problem, huh?

26 posted on 10/15/2007 2:41:51 PM PDT by Hi Heels (Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000
There is no trust fund - just IOUs promising to tax the living bejabbers out of everyone.

If we had just elected save the planet Al Gore, it would be safely in a "lock box" right now.

27 posted on 10/15/2007 2:43:18 PM PDT by Graybeard58 ( Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Realistically, I don't believe the utility of the system will last another 10 years.

The value of the dollar is getting so watered down that the purchase power of the payment is beginning to vanish.

Recipients will be purchasing a monthly supply of whiskey and cigarettes.

28 posted on 10/15/2007 2:44:15 PM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hi Heels

Well said.


29 posted on 10/15/2007 2:45:12 PM PDT by Graybeard58 ( Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Illuminatas

The other solution is the one they did in the Children of Men book.


30 posted on 10/15/2007 2:45:14 PM PDT by tbw2 (Science fiction with real science - "Humanity's Edge" - on amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Thank you. I feel much better.


31 posted on 10/15/2007 2:46:05 PM PDT by Hi Heels (Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Illuminatas
Now tell me - am I paranoid or Karnac?

I don't think your paranoid at all. I think the feds would pull just about anything to get their hands on as much of our money as possible.

I'm beginning to think that burying our money in a desert is the only safe option anymore.

32 posted on 10/15/2007 2:47:30 PM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

I’m a depression kid and have gotten back more than I ever put into SS.

The thing I was taught that the boomers weren’t is how to manage money.


33 posted on 10/15/2007 2:48:07 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hi Heels
We should all simply toss our old California born butts into the ocean so there is pleeenty of yummy food and drink and cushy cushions for you because you are a better person since you weren't born at the time I was or live in a state with a coastline!

As an unrepentant Xer, it certainly does amuse me that 'the first boomer' to apply for SS is a Hyphenated Woman former school teacher.

I love it when my stereotypes are borne out!

34 posted on 10/15/2007 2:49:48 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (Peace Through Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
What do people born after 1960 have in common with “Baby Boomers”? I resent being lumped together with them.

AMEN!

I remember when I was a child we weren't lumped in with them. Then, somewhere along the line those of us born in the early sixties became part of the Baby Boom. The Baby Boom is made up of people whose parents were in WWII. My parents were children during WWII. Some folks born in the early sixties had parents who were BORN during WWII. Guess the Boomers needed to add a few more to their ranks to make them seem even more important.

I AM NOT A BOOMER NOR WILL I EVER BE!!!! While those morons were wallowing in sex, drugs and protest I was playing with dolls. I came of political age during the Reagan years, not during Vietnam. I refuse to be categorized as one of them.

35 posted on 10/15/2007 2:50:54 PM PDT by keepitreal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

36 posted on 10/15/2007 2:51:01 PM PDT by groanup (Why do the shrill and shrieking SQL's accuse the opposition of shrieking shrilly?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
What do people born after 1960 have in common with “Baby Boomers”? I resent being lumped together with them.

1960. I guess you really didn't have the opportunity to be 'lumped in' with those nasty selfish Boomers, did you?


37 posted on 10/15/2007 2:52:47 PM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Capt_Hank

” you will get the final appointment via telephone”

What’s that all about?

I filled out the aplication, mailed it in, and never heard from them again and got the check in the mail.


38 posted on 10/15/2007 2:53:58 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Anyone under the age of,say,60 who thinks that their retirement will even remotely resemble that of their WWII-generation parents
needs to have his/her head examined.Within the lifetime of all such people “Social Security”,as we know it today,will cease to exist.In it’s place an entity will be created...and most likely called “Social Security”....that will be 100% means-tested thus making it a form of welfare and enraging those of us who were stupid enough to save for our retirements.
39 posted on 10/15/2007 2:54:58 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (If martyrdom is so cool,why does Osama Obama go to such great lengths to avoid it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avacado

I was born in 63 so that makes me a shadow boomer I guess. I’ve long excepted that I am lumped in with the boomers as a constituency. Read many articles that place it at 64. What this means to me is that I’ll be one of the last men standing from this constituency long after it has sucked the gov’t tit dry and long after it has any political power in my twilight years. It behooves us 40 somethings to reform these government “handout to the aged” programs.


40 posted on 10/15/2007 2:59:04 PM PDT by Delacon (When in doubt, ask a liberal and then do the opposite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-193 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson