Dobson is in favor of an amendment to the constitution that protects unborn children versus turning it back to the states. He probably thinks (and rightly so) that if it is turned back to the states, it will likely remain legal.
As we all know, Fred is in favor of turning it back to the states.
So, If we get 97% of what we want, thats not enough. Lets help elect Hillary by encouraging third party. I bet Hillary’s people Love Dobson for what he did. He’s a useful Idiot.
As we all know, Fred is in favor of turning it back to the states.
And that's the problem with many conservatives...they too prefer to ignore the constitution in favor of pushing their views on the masses at the federal level.
Turning it back to the states is a possible step forward. A nation-wide ban is NOT going to happen.
Right. And Fred has not come out and said he'd support a state abortion ban in Tennessee. In fact, in this youtube clip, it appears that Fred says he will not support a state ban on abortion. While Fred and Mitt are both saying the right things now, and both have excellent records in office, Mitt does support a state ban on abortion once Roe v. Wade is overturned while Fred has not stated that he would support such a ban. Fred vs. Mitt on state abortion ban explained here. See youtube clip.
This is one of the issues which has disqualified Fred in Dobson's mind. It's also why Mark DeMoss' comments make so much sense as well: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1909920/posts (Evangelical publicist sends letter to evangelical leaders urging them to rally Romney support)
Abortion should be a state issue!!!!! Fred is right on this issue.