A Giuliani presidency would be even more of a disaster in terms of unborn life than a Hillary presidency.
Lets assume that Hillary wins in 08. 4 years of pro-abortion governance pass. Now, there are three possible outcomes for 2012: either she will run for re-election, another Democrat (who will assuredly be pro-life) will win, or a Republican (who will most likely be pro-life) will win. Odds are that a pro-life Republican will be elected either in 2012 or 2016. Now, assuming Giuliani wins: we will again see 4 years under a pro-abortion president. However, he will most likely run for reelection. So, in 2012 the choices will be for either a pro-abortion Democrat or a pro-abortion Republican. Either way, we are guaranteed at least 8 years under a pro-life government.
It is clear that abortion policy will be less negatively impacted by even a Hillary presidency than a Giuliani presidency.
B. If Hillary is elected, she will most certainly appoint pro-choice justices to the Supreme Court.
C. If Hillary is elected, the pro-life movement may never recover.
The bible does not teach us to avoid challenges by running away or hiding from issues. We are taught to do the best with what we have. If Rudy is the best choice in 2008, responsible pro-life Christians will vote for him. How anyone could possibly believe that he will be worse than Hillary for the pro-life movement is beyond me. The best way to avoid this potential problem in '08 is to make sure Rudy does not get the nomination for the GOP. As the article says, that battle can only be won in the primaries.