[Mrs. Don-o]

Giuliani already has quite a record of receiving verbal bouquets from the National Abortion Rights Action League (now called "NARAL Pro-Choice America") for appointing liberal judges when he was Mayor of NY. As anyone can see. When he says he'd appoint "strict constructionists," I think we can safely assume he's lying.

Why? For FReepers sake, he's a pro-abortion New York liberal. He doesn't have a problem with killing. Why would have have a problem with lying?

[gscc]

The three biggest lies - for those gullible enough to believe them:

• I gave at the office.
• The check is in the mail.
• Giuliani will nominate strict constructionist judges.

[stephenjohnbanker]

“Why? For FReepers sake, he’s a pro-abortion New York liberal. He doesn’t have a problem with killing. Why would have have a problem with lying?”

Rudy lies like a rug!!

We have a winner!!

[okie01]

When [Giuliani] says he'd appoint "strict constructionists," I think we can safely assume he's lying.

To be blunt, so what?

You really think Hillary will appoint "strict constructionists"?

I am NOT a Giuliani supporter. I will NOT vote for him in the primary. But, should he be the nominee, I will NOT be facing a "dilemma".

I'll vote for Giuliani. I may not get what I favor on the pro-life issue, but the country won't be dragged further into socialist totalitarianism.

I simply cannot see where there is any "dilemma".