 |
 |
Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
Posted on 10/14/2007 4:21:04 PM PDT by cpforlife.org
Either one wins, we all lose!
|
|
How, in heaven's name, can that be a "dilemma".
Which candidate will work to destroy the existence of the pro-life movement? And which one will not?
Which candidate has promised to appoint justices like Alito and Roberts? And which one has not?
There's no "dilemma" to it.
Stop Giuliani ping!
Without morals they are just animals and should not be elected dog catcher!
Ridiculous. Rudy and Hillary both believe a woman’s right to choose (to murder her unborn children) is a constitutional right. Neither will seek or work to appoint or confirm pro-life judges. Either of these two power hungry liberal whores would lie, steal, cheat and sell their souls to take the White House.
How, in heaven's name, can that be a "dilemma".
No dilemma for me, I will not vote for either of them.
“Either one wins, we all lose!”
So very true!
The news:
“Mom and Dad” as well as “husband and wife” have been banned from California schools under a bill signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who with his signature also ordered public schools to allow boys to use girls restrooms and locker rooms, and vice versa, if they choose. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1910689/posts
because it might offend sodomites and their ilk is an illustration of what CA gets for electing a RINO as Govornor.
The same would be true with Rooty.
I’ll repeat this as often as necessary: If a politician supports abortion they are capable of any evil, and we should expect it from them.
Rooty could be worse than the dreaded hildabeast in some ways because the surviving Republicans in Congress would probably put up less resistance to him than her.
And that’s just the tip of the icebeg.
PING
Observation: the lesser of two evils often gets more evil accomplished precisely because s/he doesn’t seem so bad, or is on “the right side”. Hillary will make little progress because there will be tremendous Republican opposition. Rudy would do much to advance the leftist agenda precisely because, being a Republican, he’ll get more support.
We saw exactly this in NY when switching from hardcore leftist Cuomo to allegedly right-wing Pataki: gun control and other issues got a LOT worse precisely because Pataki, a socialist at heart, automatically got the blind support of Republicans.
Sometimes the greater of two evils is the better choice: people recognize it as evil.
Why do you trust the word of a committed supporter of baby killing?
To me that’s dangerous and naive.
Here’s another aspect of where Rudy Giuliani stands on abortion that is rarely acknowleged. It’s unfortunately true that he believes legal abortion to be sound public policy. But he also believes that the issue of abortion should be decided in the political arena (namely state legislators and state referendums), not by judicial fiat. In that regard, his view is no different than that of the pro-life movement.
It's the only choice of the ENEMEDIA!!!!
You trust Hillery over Rudy? You need to reevaluate your priorities and ability to discern credible threats to your liberties. I’m not a big Rudy fan, but I’d take him over Hillery any day of the week. Heck, I’d take Ron Paul over Hillery.
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
“Either one wins, we all lose!”
But, we lose the most with the Antichrist.
If Julianne is elected president, we pro-lifers better be sure there is a Senate majority of Republicans and a Republican majority in the House to keep him from selling conservatism down the tubes of his own self-aggrandizement.
The closest I want Hillary to the White House is if someone drops it on her.
I attempted to say that in 9 but you said it perfectly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.