Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I'm not a historian. It is only my opinion that when Lincoln was elected and the South lost the Civil War that our country started to go downhill. It seems to me thats when states rights were overruled and the federal goverment took control over our rights.

Granted it has gotten progressively worse since then.

Please don't flame! I'm posting this to learn and to find out what (better informed) FReepers think.

1 posted on 10/14/2007 7:14:12 AM PDT by proudofthesouth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: proudofthesouth

Ummm, no.


26 posted on 10/14/2007 7:41:50 AM PDT by Cymbaline (I repeat myself when under stress I repeat myself when under stress I repeat myself when under stres)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proudofthesouth

Ummm, no.


27 posted on 10/14/2007 7:43:31 AM PDT by Cymbaline (I repeat myself when under stress I repeat myself when under stress I repeat myself when under stres)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proudofthesouth

Who wanted to keep slavery?

Democrats

Who decided to form their own little country to retain slavery?

Democrats

Who created the Confederate Battle flag?

Democrats

Who started the Klu Klux Klan?

Democrats

Who used the institutionalized racism and fear to maintain their grip on the south for almost 100 years after the civil war?

Democrats

Who would have you believe that Lincoln destroyed this nation
by trying to save it?

take your time, there is only one possible answer.


28 posted on 10/14/2007 7:45:51 AM PDT by usmcobra (I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proudofthesouth
IMO, the “Civil War” was the triumph of the Nationalists over the Federalists. It clearly marked the end of the essential idea that the several states were sovereign in their own right that had entered into a voluntary compact under a constitution that gave limited, and strictly enumerated powers to a central government.

There is now a substantial and irrefutable body of historical evidence that peaceful secession was always a valid option for states should they reach a sufficient level of dissatisfaction with the federal government.

We only have to look to the Kentucky and Virgina Resolutions of 1798 as proof. Thomas Jefferson himself “...thought that any state government could nullify unconstitutional acts by the federal government, whereas Madison felt that the states needed to act in concert to do so. The crucial point is that they both regarded the states, not the courts, as the bulwark of the people’s liberties. It is highly instructive that, five years before the concept of judicial review was born in Marbury v. Madison, many Americans, including the author of the Declaration of Independence and the Father of the Constitution, looked to state governments as the remedy to federal usurpation of power.”

from:
Reclaiming the American Revolution
by George C. Leef, Posted December 30, 2005
revew of the book:
Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy by William J. Watkins Jr. (Independent Institute, 2004); 236 pages; $39.95.

at:
http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd0509g.asp

Of these Resolutions, the wikipedia entry states:

“...The resolutions declared that the Constitution was a “compact.” That is, it was an agreement among the states. The federal government had no right to exercise powers not specifically delegated to it; should the federal government assume such powers, its acts under them would be void. Thus it was the right of the states to decide as to the constitutionality of such laws passed by Congress....”

see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kentucky_and_Virginia_Resolutions

Interestingly, I read that one of the lesser Republican candidates has stated he would support a Presidential Commission to study and publish a report on restoring the full power of the Tenth Amendment.

IMO, just the fact that this Amendment is obscure and almost ignored by the government and sadly by the Supreme Court, proves how far down the road we have come since the North invaded the South to enforce collection of the Tariff of Abomination.

30 posted on 10/14/2007 7:47:03 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proudofthesouth

This country’s downfall began on Aug. 30, 1932. Francis W. Davis is responsible.


36 posted on 10/14/2007 8:01:55 AM PDT by Jaxter ("Vivit Post Funera Virtus")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stainlessbanner

ping


37 posted on 10/14/2007 8:06:20 AM PDT by groanup (Why do the shrill and shrieking SQL's accuse the opposition of shrieking shrilly?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stand watie

I believe your opinion has been solicited.


38 posted on 10/14/2007 8:07:12 AM PDT by groanup (Why do the shrill and shrieking SQL's accuse the opposition of shrieking shrilly?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proudofthesouth
The great myth is that the WBTS was only about slavery and the good guys won and abolished it.

Slavery was one issue out of many for the South. Other than a pocket of abolitionists in New England, the North had no truck with slavery and created its own form of "Jim Crow" from time to time. Some Northern politicians railed about new states and territories remaining free lands and the South felt threatened by that. It would mean more representation in D.C. for ideas that seemed at odds with Southern interests.

The WBTS was about preserving the Union. It was preserved but at what cost ultimately: 600,000 lives and a central government that is all powerful and steals our rights like they were candy in a baby's hand?

40 posted on 10/14/2007 8:14:47 AM PDT by groanup (Why do the shrill and shrieking SQL's accuse the opposition of shrieking shrilly?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proudofthesouth

No FDR destroyed America, first with the great society then with all his concessions to Stalin. He had more reds in his administration then any other president in history. OH wait maybe not the Clintons any way. After FDR that is when the schools and other institutions started being taken by the Commies. Hollywood followed in the fifties and then all the colleges in the 60s. So no Lincoln didnt destroy america. The lefts American Idol did! PS Joe Mccarthy was a true american hero!


43 posted on 10/14/2007 8:17:32 AM PDT by crazydad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proudofthesouth
America began with an Age of Enlightenment pro-reason worldview as exemplified by the Declaration of Independence and Common Sense and has gradually been doing everything wrong to destroy that worldview ever since.
44 posted on 10/14/2007 8:18:03 AM PDT by mjp (Live & let live. I don't want to live in Mexico, Marxico, or Muslimico. Statism & high taxes suck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proudofthesouth

Nah. The US decline started with Wilson’s plan to grab the Empire baton from England. This put us on British glidepath to the death of a thousand wars. Growth of Washington government control to control US society was the result.

Acceptance of George Washington’s admonition against foreign entanglements is our best chance for a reversal. But since both parties are dominated by trade and war interests, more control will continue to gravitate to Washington.


47 posted on 10/14/2007 8:22:12 AM PDT by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proudofthesouth

I’ve always heard that LIncoln wanted to return the slaves to their country of origin. Obviously that never happened, but I have heard it said many times.

Lincoln dealt with a heck of a lot that would make other presidents cringe.


49 posted on 10/14/2007 8:23:57 AM PDT by television is just wrong (deport all illegal aliens NOW. Put all AMERICANS TO WORK FIRST. END Welfare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proudofthesouth

I’ve always heard that LIncoln wanted to return the slaves to their country of origin. Obviously that never happened, but I have heard it said many times.

Lincoln dealt with a heck of a lot that would make other presidents cringe.


50 posted on 10/14/2007 8:24:06 AM PDT by television is just wrong (deport all illegal aliens NOW. Put all AMERICANS TO WORK FIRST. END Welfare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proudofthesouth

I’ve always heard that LIncoln wanted to return the slaves to their country of origin. Obviously that never happened, but I have heard it said many times.

Lincoln dealt with a heck of a lot that would make other presidents cringe.


51 posted on 10/14/2007 8:24:22 AM PDT by television is just wrong (deport all illegal aliens NOW. Put all AMERICANS TO WORK FIRST. END Welfare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proudofthesouth

I can’t fault Lincoln for seeking to preserve the Union. The blame more likely can be placed on the Radical Republicans who stuck us with the 14th Amendment after Lincoln’s death. That set in motion the idea of egalitarianism and effectively repealed the 10th Amendment. I don’t think the authors and ratifiers of the 14th Amendment intended it to go as far as it has gone, but they were irresponsible in framing it so vaguely, including the citizenship clause which has been used to give citizenship to anchor babies.


53 posted on 10/14/2007 8:25:31 AM PDT by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proudofthesouth
My only observation is that compared to Presidents' Lincoln and FDR, George Bush hasn't laid a glove on the CONSTITUTION!!

So you know where I am coming from I believe both Lincoln and FDR did what they HAD TO do to preserve the UNITED STATES of America.

57 posted on 10/14/2007 8:30:40 AM PDT by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proudofthesouth

I think America started going down hill when some freepers posted provocative posts and then weren’t around to participate in the debate!


59 posted on 10/14/2007 8:31:14 AM PDT by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proudofthesouth
Man...the Civil war is so old news.

Slavery was wrong - it is too bad we had to fight about it way back when, but we did, slavery in our country is rightly over, and it's very silly to ask stupid questions like this.

If you're looking to blame something for the current state of affairs...well, I blame CNN. And maybe McDonalds.

I love living in the south, I enjoy my southern friends, I ain't leaving, and I wish all y'all would get over the 'yankee' thang.

Since you asked a silly question:

30 things you will never hear a southern boy say...

30. Oh I just couldn't, she's only sixteen.
29. I'll take Shakespeare for 1000, Alex.
28. Duct tape won't fix that.
27. Come to think of it, I'll have a Heineken.
26. We don't keep firearms in this house.
25. You can't feed that to the dog.
24. No kids in the back of the pickup, it's just not safe.
23. Wrestling's fake.
22. We're vegetarians.
21. Do you think my gut is too big?
20. I'll have grapefruit and grapes instead of biscuits and gravy.
19. Honey, we don't need another dog.
18. Who gives a dang who won the Civil War?
17. Give me the small bag of pork rinds.
16. Too many deer heads detract from the decor.
15. I just couldn't find a thing at Wal-Mart today.
14. Trim the fat off that steak.
13. Cappuccino tastes better than espresso.
12. The tires on that truck are too big.
11. I've got it all on the C: drive.
10. Unsweetened tea tastes better.
9. My fiancee, Bobbie Jo, is registered at Tiffany's.
8. I've got two cases of Zima for the Super Bowl.
7. Checkmate.
6. She's too young to be wearing a bikini.
5. Hey, here's an episode of "Hee Haw" that we haven't seen.
4. I don't have a favorite college team.
3. You All.
2. Those shorts ought to be a little longer, Betty Mae.
AND NUMBER ONE....
1. Nope, no more for me. I'm driving.

63 posted on 10/14/2007 8:35:50 AM PDT by ImProudToBeAnAmerican (Tom Daschle is deeply saddened... Remember him? Bahahahahahahahahaha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proudofthesouth

Our downfall really accelerated when writers, for unknown reasons, invented the word “loosing,” ignoring the proper word “losing.” “Loozing” I could understand, but not “loosing.”


64 posted on 10/14/2007 8:38:33 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: proudofthesouth
>>>Did President Lincoln Destroy The U.S.?

Your headline is an internally answered question.

Since had Lincoln not prevailed, the states that claimed to make up the Confederacy would have become dis-united from the United States, ergo, the states would no longer have been united, ergo there would have been no United States.

Had the Confederacy succeeded, Rhode Island would have certainly succeeded over the Bicycle Riders issue within a few years, and Pennsylvania and New Jersey, and possibly New York would have succeeded soon after that on the issue of Interdigitation.

It would then be all over.

71 posted on 10/14/2007 8:50:26 AM PDT by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 in Vietnam meant never having to say I was sorry......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson