Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Old 300
“The loss of representation has sweeping implications. It means that you will not get your country back following any of their leadership. If that’s OK with you, then I’ll concede that I wasn’t able to persuade you in any way.”

I’d love to revive the Constitution. I’d also like for my country to survive the threat of global Islamic fundamentalism. And that’s not going to happen with Ron Paul in office. We can do all the domestic wonders that Ron Paul advocates, safe the Constitution and give the power back to the people as originally intended, but if we don’t defeat the Islamic threat all those victories will be little more than an academic exercise.

Ron Paul has a lot right. Unfortunately, he’s fatally flawed, and there is no saving him.

212 posted on 10/17/2007 7:50:31 PM PDT by RavenATB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]


To: RavenATB
I’d love to revive the Constitution. I’d also like for my country to survive the threat of global Islamic fundamentalism

This is a false dilemma of the worst kind. The white house is celebrating Ramadan. Almost a half million Muslims have immigrated since 9/11. Head scarves are everywhere. Saudi-funded mosques are constantly in the news.

What we're doing is not working to the ends you hope. You simply must ask yourself why congress, the judiciary, and the executive are refusing to conduct their business in our interests. It's because they're beholden to someone else besides the American people. What they tell us they're doing is generally not true. Once in a while they're honest, but it's very rare. Ron Paul is honest, and this hurts him because he cannot give you exactly what you want. He can't promise to defeat our enemies. But the current promises aren't being realized, and the war has gone on for longer than WWII did. Why is that? Because there is no real goal of winning. It's a game of globalist economics, and the main beneficiaries are the bankers and the oil nations. We're the losers.

The choice is actually much more difficult to make for those of us who support America's interests abroad: we will actually lose the Republic permanently if we do not take it back from the globalists.

You may actually be required to decide if you want war or the Constitution. I think it is very safe to say, given my personal study of Ron Paul's words and comments, that Americans will be much more at liberty to defend themselves against terrorism with a Constitutionalist in the white house.

Unfortunately, he’s fatally flawed, and there is no saving him.

This is the globalist perspective of Ron Paul. It's not true. It won't stick. If he doesn't win the election, it'll be due to liberals refusing to support someone who'd take their safety net away. But he'd be giving us the safety net of economic prosperity and security if we'd give him a chance.

213 posted on 10/17/2007 8:02:46 PM PDT by Old 300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson