So you agree that we should stick to the Constitution. If so, then what’s wrong with Ron Paul as far as you’re concerned? Don’t you admit that the Constitution is being treated like old newsprint these days by most elected and appointed officials? Which leading GOP candidates are even discussing the Constitutional crisis? They don’t seem to mention it often, if at all. The best they can mutter is something about states rights when they don’t want to be pinned down on an issue.
“So you agree that we should stick to the Constitution.”
I said that the Constitution should be amended, when necessary, rather then ignored.
What’s wrong with Ron Paul is that he has a childishly ignorant view of America’s role in the world and the threat we face overseas. We cannot confront and defeat terrorism by surrendering, or by blaming ourselves in some self-loathing manner for our economic and military interaction with the Middle East, nor can we increase our national security by pretending that our only challenge or responsibility is within our own borders.
All of RP’s other positions...many of them very good...are no more valuable than a fart in the bathtub if we don’t survive as a nation. The man is unfit for the White House.