1. I don't believe even if "he who shall not be named" were NOT a "candidate" you would be voting for any of the 5 listed and it had zero to do with principle, you have none.
2. "he who shall not be named 2008" was the last listed sponsor of the event, it was his dance.
3. I have been in some very heated debates in my 3 years here and have never, until this point, made it personal, you have earned an exception: You Old 300 are a fraud and agitator.
4. I would like to propose the congressman from Texas who claim to be a conservative be referred to from this point forward as "he who shall not be named".
Respectfully,
ONC
I don’t see much to discuss in that post, do you? Thanks.
He was an exibitor (similar to the NRA) not a sponsor .. read post again ...