[isthisnickcool]

So in other words, you are opposed to a trade agreement with, say, South Korea because we have an illegal immigration problem.

If I had wanted to make my point using other words I would have used other words.

Asking me if I apposed trade agreements because several female celebrities have not worn underwear in public recently makes about as much sense as the question you asked in response to my post. Maybe more sense actually.

[1rudeboy]

No, you can't wriggle off the hook so easily . . . one can presume that you were speaking of our illegal immigration problem, and not underwear, when you wrote about getting "$20+ million of us to move to Mexico and live off their sociaty for free."

[Will88]

“Asking me if I apposed trade agreements because several female celebrities have not worn underwear in public recently makes about as much sense as the question you asked in response to my post. Maybe more sense actually.”

I vote that it makes more sense. 1rudeboy specializes in the inane one-liner. Others have called his responses obtuse, but I think your response might be the most creative and on point that I’ve seen, Lol.