Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: businessprofessor
*Cough* you are back again. I win the pool. :) No joke.

We cannot export things to poorer nations that cost more to manufacture here then everywhere else, and most of our things do.

The only way for these agreements to expand our trade on an equal basis is to value all of the currency the same.

Strangely the dollar continues to fall - it is now below the Canadian value! - and the dollar is neatly coming into the range where pesos will be envisioned at near parity, once they adjust out a few things.

Then you can have your precious Amero, senor, which is where all of this is designed to go.

And don’t even try to deny it.

We can still tell that a dog has passed by seeing the paw-prints in the snow.

And we can see you, as well.

12 posted on 10/13/2007 8:59:55 AM PDT by bill1952 (The 10 most important words for change: "If it is to be, it is up to me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: bill1952
We cannot export things to poorer nations that cost more to manufacture here then everywhere else, and most of our things do.

Wow, that's a whole lotta' nuthin' . . . last year, almost 1030 billion dollars' worth of goods.

13 posted on 10/13/2007 9:06:43 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: bill1952
Can you identify a reference for your currency theory? I do not recall this theory from my economics courses. I am not sure what you mean by equal basis. I have not seen "equal basis" used when measuring trade agreements. I am not sure why you are bringing up the subject of the Amero.

“The only way for these agreements to expand our trade on an equal basis is to value all of the currency the same.”

Perhaps you should focus on debating my main points:

- Trade agreements are complex documents. Perhaps it would be preferable to have simpler agreements but I am not sure if simpler agreements are possible.

- All things equal, more trade is preferred to less trade.

- The US has many trade barriers. The old situation of open US markets and closed foreign markets has changed.

Your main point is that we cannot compete on manufacturing. On balance, I agree with your point. In specific areas, we compete very well. Our main problem is not manufacturing. We compete well in providing goods and services if we have a good political environment. The environment with over regulation, high taxes, energy mandates, union thuggery, and litigation madness is choking us. On balance, trade agreements are not a problem.

18 posted on 10/13/2007 9:16:56 AM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: bill1952
and the dollar is neatly coming into the range where pesos will be envisioned at near parity, once they adjust out a few things.

Math is hard. LOL!

56 posted on 10/13/2007 11:55:05 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: bill1952
and the dollar is neatly coming into the range where pesos will be envisioned at near parity, once they adjust out a few things.

Wow, parity is right around the corner. LOL!

66 posted on 10/13/2007 2:01:13 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson