To: Caipirabob
>>That’s what killed the Thompson in the end, isn’t it?
I believe what killed the Thompson was that it was complex and expensive to manufacture, especially once the M3 grease gun started hitting the inventory.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M3_submachine_gun
24 posted on
10/13/2007 5:19:38 AM PDT by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: FreedomPoster
My grandpa favored the grease gun much more than the thompson because it had a more accuracy when he used them in WW2.
To: FreedomPoster; Caipirabob
Old Thompsons never die...
they just run out of ammo--
48 posted on
10/13/2007 10:00:51 AM PDT by
Bender2
("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
To: FreedomPoster
The Thompson was killed by several factors, price being the main one. Weight, machine tool time, use of valuable materials also played a part, and the widespread issue of the M1 Carbine also factored in. Thompsons are super cool, but they weigh a ton.
This Kriss gun is interesting, and cool that it’s in .45, but it looks to me like durability would be a major factor. When you’ve got the bolt turning corners, there’s going to be a lot of wear.
To: FreedomPoster
I enjoyed familiarization firing the M3 grease gun at the Ft. Knox Armor School. Whatever you hit stayed hit, but not much for accuracy. Great fun though.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson