Posted on 10/12/2007 8:16:30 AM PDT by reaganaut1
The bitter dispute ripping apart the social fabric of Ocean Grove, N.J., a lovely Victorian enclave 40 miles south of Manhattan, began simply enough. Long-time residents Harriet Bernstein, 65, a retired schoolteacher, and Luisa Paster, 60, a Princeton University staff developer, wanted to celebrate their civil union on the town's boardwalk pavilion. The ceremony would have been legal, since New Jersey in 2004 had become the fifth state in the nation to recognize homosexual civil unions.
But Ocean Grove isn't just any pretty town. Founded as a Methodist camp in 1869, it was the first permanent camp meeting dedicated to the pursuit of both holiness and recreation, according to historian Troy Messenger, author of "Holy Leisure: Recreation & Religion in God's Square Mile."
Ocean Grove has remained a religious retreat for its entire existence. Its leaders adhere to the Methodist Book of Discipline, which warns that "ceremonies that celebrate homosexual unions shall not be conducted by our ministers and shall not be conducted in our churches." Thus, says executive director Scott Hoffman, they cannot permit the civil union ceremony. "We own 100% of the land, including parks, beach, boardwalk, and a thousand feet of riparian rights, granted by the state. We worship on the boardwalk, and cannot allow activity in opposition to our deeply held religious beliefs."
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
Oh, great, the Democrats have another Harriet and Luisa to beat us over the head with!
It’s homosexuals like these that cause the backlash against the rest.
They don’t have a right to marry wherever they want, the only have a right to enter into a civil union. Nowhere does it say those civil unions must be able to be performed anyplace the entrants wish.
It’s homosexuals like these that cause the backlash against the rest.
They don’t have a right to marry wherever they want, the only have a right to enter into a civil union. Nowhere does it say those civil unions must be able to be performed anyplace the entrants wish.
While I'm totally against gay "marriage", it doesn't sound like it's against the law to perform any sort of marriage there. Besides, didn't God create the entire Earth making it all sacred?
This is a situation that we all need to follow closely. The law says they can have a civil union, but it gives them no rights as to where the ceremony can take place. If the government decides that they can have the ceremony on the boardwalk its a short leap to the actual church. God help us all
I live near Ocean Grove & know it well. The Gays have been buying the beautiful old houses there for many years now. Same as Asbury Park. Its been a long time since the ban on alcohol in the Grove. Or the ban of cars on the weekends. There is still a religious retreat but the Gays are taking the town over IMO.
The Gays don't need to be doing this. They could easily get married in Asbury Park or somewhere else. Its all about them as usual.
That’s why I affectionately refer to the so called “gay” community as:
The narcissistic cult of conspicuous sexuality. It is in fact a death cult.
The funny thing about all this is that homosexual ‘relationships’ don’t even last that long. In Massachusetts their ‘marriages’ are already falling apart at an astounding rate. In other areas of the country, homosexual civil unions are terminated as fast as they swap partners. It’s going to be harder and harder for homosexual activists to perpetuate the lie that they’re healthy when these negative statistics keep piling up.
I get so mad when the Garden State Equality Group starts pushing their gay agenda in the schools with their movies. I won't allow my 8 yr old to read the gay books or see the movies. I want to know if the children are told the dangers of being Gay after their movies like Its Ok To Be Gay are shown. I highly doubt it. They wouldn't tell the kids about the danger of AIDS, STD'S etc. I don't see why they're called Gay either. All the ones I never knew were not happy people.
Thank you for the advice. I plan to stand firm and try to get other parents to understand what great harm this is doing to our children & families. I also plan to take a firm stand with the school. They are there to teach children education , not meddle in what they have no business in. ~P~
POST 13 was meant for you. ~P~
Where's the ACLU and their 'separation of church and state" argument?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.