Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vanders9

“Umm...I think youll find it probably was.”

Not according to Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story:

“The real object of the [First] [A]mendment was not to countenance, much less to advance, Mahometanism, or Judaism, or infidelity, by prostrating Christianity; but to exclude all rivalry among Christian sects, and to prevent [472 U.S. 38, 105] any national ecclesiastical establishment which should give to a hierarchy the exclusive patronage of the national government. It thus cut off the means of religious persecution (the vice and pest of former ages), and of the subversion of the rights of conscience in matters of religion, which had been trampled upon almost from the days of the Apostles to the present age…”


124 posted on 10/16/2007 4:15:09 AM PDT by dsc (There is no safety for honest men except by believing all possible evil of evil men. Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: dsc

Well he wasnt one of the original draftees so that is his opinion. Besides, amongst those “not countenancing” he would have included Catholicism, atheism, and probably Anglicanism.


125 posted on 10/16/2007 4:49:19 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson