To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife; 2nd amendment mama; B4Ranch; BagCamAddict; BCR #226; Beagle8U; ...
Shal not be infringed is too tough for these fools to understand.
28 posted on
10/11/2007 8:17:50 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
To: editor-surveyor
29 posted on
10/11/2007 8:20:25 PM PDT by
BykrBayb
(In memory of my Friend T'wit, who taught me much. ~ Þ)
To: editor-surveyor
“They” understand it alright. It is the people who supposedly defend the 2nd Amendment who don’t get it. If you give in to demands to have ANY restriction on the right to bear arms, then you essentially give up that fundamental right.
To: editor-surveyor
This cannot happen. They’ve gone to far already in our book!
It only took me 5 minutes (if that) to call two Senators offices. (And it was Boxer and Feinstein... NOT EASY TO DO!)
But this also needs to get out to any media that will give a da*n!
100 posted on
10/12/2007 12:05:17 PM PDT by
Vets_Husband_and_Wife
(We stand firm with the President and the troops, never wavering. We do NOT support terrorists.)
To: editor-surveyor
Shal not be infringed is too tough for these fools to understand. We need Dr. No like never before. Ron Paul would veto this bill.
159 posted on
10/15/2007 3:56:08 AM PDT by
Old 300
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson