Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo
Kevmo wrote:
I guess the third grade punctuation was more than you could grasp. And the personal attack seals the deal — you are not a very good reflection of republicanism nor Free Republic. What do you think it means when it says, “no personal attacks”? Oh, it must not apply to you somehow; you’re above all that.

Stick to making spitwads in the sandbox. Okie Dokie, OKIEDOC?

Comment:

I am making spit wads as I write.

If you want to control and censure what is said on FR as do many on the kook fringe liberal left, then you can always buy the web site and name.

That way you and a few other Freepers can have the site all to yourselves.

When a person argues with a closed mind, nothing is gained.

When you could no longer support your debate your tactics changed to that of a debaser and Nitpicker.

Most Nitpickers are liberal but we do have several on FR and your Third Grade remarks certainly qualify for the designation.

By the way spell checker can be your friend.

BTW:

You claim to be a Christian but your extreme remarks on this thread will do nothing more than drive most nonbelievers away from Christ.

Have a good day:)

134 posted on 10/12/2007 7:59:04 AM PDT by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia, a red state wannabe. I don't take Ex Lax I just read the New York Times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: OKIEDOC

If you want to control and censure what is said on FR as do many on the kook fringe liberal left, then you can always buy the web site and name.
***You seem to really have an issue over projecting that socons want to control. It’s very simple: What you posted is against the rules. Got it? It has nothing to do with censuring or controlling what you say, it is about following a few very simple rules on this forum. If that is too difficult for you to grasp, stay in your sandbox.

When a person argues with a closed mind, nothing is gained.
***After going back & forth with you, this little motto is just so precious. I’m falling all over myself grinning at the irony.

When you could no longer support your debate your tactics changed to that of a debaser and Nitpicker.
***No, I genuinely have trouble reading through your posts. So a fun little blogthings quiz was in order. You deserved that little zinger because of your display of continuous intellectual laziness.

Most Nitpickers are liberal but we do have several on FR and your Third Grade remarks certainly qualify for the designation.
***And, with all this spurring you on, I still can’t get you to post something of substance. You are a waste of my time.

By the way spell checker can be your friend.
***Precious. Really. Irony. Too funny.

BTW:

You claim to be a Christian but your extreme remarks on this thread will do nothing more than drive most nonbelievers away from Christ.
***Well, you may have finally come up with something of substance after all. If you’re serious — notice that IF there, it means hypothetical [hello! Are you listening?]— then I challenge you to a debate. We can debate over whose posts on this thread are a better representation of Christ. We nominate a believer who agrees to decide between the two of us, with none of the baby-splitting nonsense that “both of you need to follow Christ’s footsteps closer”. The loser posts a thread that is an apology to the winner.

Have a good day:)


142 posted on 10/12/2007 10:14:50 AM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq— via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson