[tantiboh]

~”You said he and his family were ‘impeccable’.”~

Uh, no. The phrase I used was “Romney’s impeccable family values.” You even quoted it right before you misrepresented it. Reading comprehension problem?

Try understanding the meaning of words before you debate them. You’ll get a lot further.

[Leisler]

Please, you are being eelish. You said his family values are impeccable. That is creepy. Unless you are a family member, I very much doubt you know, and so you are speaking out of your hat. Shilling. Shoveling. Shelping.

That Mitt didn’t serve, and wants to be Commander in Chief is a fault. It lays with him. It is going to be hard for him to ask for sacrifices, when he and his haven’t and don’t. I hardly find that perfect, without fault. That is the definition of your over ventilated choice of ‘impeccable’. I have less respect that with 5 sons, that not one, in any capacity, has seen that it is nobel in this time to serve the nation. This lack of value reflects upon them and Mr. and Mrs Romney. Now, tell me that is not so?