Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leisler

~”You said impeccable. He, his sons, could of served. That would be better. He, they didn’t. That is less so. Certainly not ‘impeccable’.”~

Once again, what does that have to do with family values? Are veterans or parents of soldiers the only ones who can claim to have good family values?

You’re prevaricating. Either defend the non sequitur or abandon it.


80 posted on 10/11/2007 5:20:56 PM PDT by tantiboh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: tantiboh
I am prevaricating? I couldn’t use smaller words or shorter sentences, with more direct verbs if I tried.

Please.

You said he and his family were ‘impeccable’.

Since the office of the President makes the holder Commander in Chief of the armed forces, it would of been better if Mitt had served, or even in his family. They have not. That is not perfect. That is fact.

Lastly, ‘abandon’? ( chuckle ) Who died and made you the boss?

85 posted on 10/11/2007 5:33:25 PM PDT by Leisler (Sugar, the gateway to diabetes, misery and death. Stop Sugar Deaths NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson