“I hope that evangelicals read it and consider it carefully.”
Considered and rejected. I will not vote for someone who believes they are God material (that includes Reverend Moon, David Koresh, and anyone else on that path). I will not vote for someone who believes in multiple gods. I will not vote for someone who cannot read the history of his church (because Joseph Smith takes the prise for blatant charlatanism and anyone who believes his baloney is Gullible). I won’t vote for someone who believes in secret temple rights, seer stones, special handshakes and mumbo jumbo like batism of the dead because it is as superstitious as witchcraft.
In short, it isn’t going to happen.
prise=prize, boy I hate my mental typos
Well framed.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: With 535 Congressmen, if one is duped on, say, foreign policy; well, it's going to be a lot harder to dupe all 535. But with POTUS, if he or she is duped, look out. Duck.
Vulnerability to deception is not just a marginal consideration for the White House...IT IS VITAL! Vulnerability to deception is a key character consideration.
Voters should evaluate candidates on character...so yes "character" includes commitment to their wives (a big plus for Mitt); so yes, it includes commitment to their families (another big plus for Mitt); and, yes, it includes integrity and scandal-free behavior. But vulnerability to deception is yet another major indicator of character.
Mitt said perhaps the biggest mistake of his life was to be wrong on abortion. So he confessed being deceived in catering to the god of abortion; he was also deceived on anything and everything tied to abortion (embryonic stem cell research; taxpayer funding of abortion; RU-486)--you name it. At one point or another he's been deceived on every aspect of homosexuality except "gay" "marriage" (what? you think 2002 Massachusetts voters, land of Dukakis, Kennedy, and Kerry...just usher in any ole conservative into the gov's chair?)
He thinks the White House is a career move to running his own planet. He thinks voters who are spiritual apostates with abominable creeds will be ushers of his magic carpet ride to the White House.
It really comes down to this: If the gay-rights activist get "gay" "marriage" there won't be any other "right" denied to them--including "gay" "marriage" being taught to our sons and daughters in public schools plus many of our churches offering "gay" "marriage" ceremonies to pre-empt being sued or held in violation of extended civil rights sanctions. Getting "gay" marriage in would be society's "Good Housekeeping" stamp of approval upon the entire GLBT agenda. Likewise, a lot of LDS gatekeepers know that once a Mormon is in the White House, it will be society's "Good Housekeeping" stamp of approval upon everything Joseph Smith said, taught, and lived.
With a Mitt White House, expect the Salt Lake City PR machine (& budget) to multiply 100 times overnight.