Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: coffee260

She openly attacked religious pluralism, and while probably a well crafted statement devised before being on stage, she also implied that non-Christians have religious traditions unworthy of inclusion in the American society while on stage.

She fundamentally attacked the basic tenants of a single religion, Judaism, but it has wider implications. She then questioned a man’s religious conviction on national TV, as a guest of his show, in his house, and then used a sterotype from a Jewish sitcom to back up her case, showing her absolute ignorance of first person experience on the subject....

She just piled on the stoopid and the ignorance in that interview.


208 posted on 10/11/2007 4:19:27 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]


To: JerseyHighlander
I hope you know it reads like your writing a parody for Onion but I appreciate your correspondence. Let's take them one by one.
She openly attacked religious pluralism...
If believing that your own religion is the right religion and that who so ever believeth in your God shall not parish but shall have ever lasting life is attacking religious pluralism, which by the way, is really a euphemism that usually means Christians should shut up, than I attack religious pluralism every day. 
she also implied that non-Christians have religious traditions unworthy of inclusion in the American society while on stage.
What do you mean by implied. You reading her thoughts now? This, my friend, is called projection. It's were you project onto someone else what you see in yourself. So maybe it's you who believe "that non-(whatever your religion is) have religious traditions unworthy of inclusion in the American society while on stage."
She fundamentally attacked the basic tenants of a single religion, Judaism, but it has wider implications. She then questioned a man’s religious conviction on national TV, as a guest of his show, in his house,...
GASP...How dare she! and "in his house," no less! This calls for a Congressional inquiry. Possibly legislation restriction religious bigots like Ann Coulter from "questioned a man’s religious conviction on national TV, as a guest of his show," and  "in-his-house,..." Didn't Deusch say he was a practicing Jew? Except, I see, on Sabbath. Being he does his show's on the Sabbath. But that part of his "religious conviction" is beyond reproach. One thing you should know. Obervation of the Sabbath is the most important, fundamental tenant of Judaism. Right? So that would make Ann...drum roll please...right. 
she then used a sterotype from a Jewish sitcom to back up her case, showing her absolute ignorance of first person experience on the subject....
Now that's where I really thought of the Onion parody but I'll try and take it serious. You know, just for fun. Again, I think there's some projection going on here. Of the hundreds, maybe even thousands of Seinfeld episodes I've watched over the years, not once, once have I ever thought of it as a Jewish sitcom. Never ever. So to call it a sterotype shows someones own sensitivity on the subject. Not Ann's bigotry.  

221 posted on 10/11/2007 5:05:03 PM PDT by coffee260 (coffee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson