To: wideawake
If an American is arrested for a crime in Mexico, we want our citizens to have access to the US consulate. That is what this case is about.
He wasn't denied access to the consulate. He never brought the issue up at trial.
11 posted on
10/11/2007 1:22:32 PM PDT by
Gigantor
(McCarthy’s conspiracy theory has become an American reality.)
To: Gigantor
He wasn't denied access to the consulate. He never brought the issue up at trial. He was supposed to be advised of his right to consult his consulate.
If a native-born criminal goes to trial without a state-provided or other attorney and is convicted without being represented in court, any conviction will be overturned, even if the police testify that "he never asked for an attorney."
16 posted on
10/11/2007 1:44:01 PM PDT by
wideawake
(Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
To: Gigantor
Also, the fact that he was never in touch with his consulate will constitute another set of potential grounds for his appeal - i.e. that he was incompetently represented by an attorney who never advised him of his right to contact his consulate.
18 posted on
10/11/2007 1:53:57 PM PDT by
wideawake
(Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson