History tells us that the "most qualified" or the "one with the best grasp of the facts" doesn't necessarily make the best leader. Take GWH Bush for instance. On paper, he had the best resume you could want. The problem is he wasn't a leader. Of course he wasn't a conservative but that's another discussion.
The fact is that 95% of the American public have never heard of Duncan Hunter. Of the 5% that have, propably 95% of them have no idea what he looks like. An even smaller number actually know what he stands for.
This begs the question "Why has nobody heard of this guy?". He's been in Congress forever but what has he done? What has he done to show that he can be the leader of the free world? The bottom line is that he may be a good bureaucrat but he does not inspire people. If he did, he would have more money and would be higher in the polls. Is he a good guy? Probably. Is he a good candidate? No!
If you knew his history, you would know he is by far the best candidate we have had since Reagan. The fact that he is still fairly obscure does not change that. He will not be obscure for long.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1909679/posts#3
Check this out for some information on Hunter. To say he hasn’t done anything is not accurate at all.
Let me get this straight, you’re a Fred supporter and you are asking what Duncan Hunter has done and suggesting he isn’t a leader? HAHA! Keep ‘em comin’, your delivery is superb. You nearly had me believing you were serious. BTC