[jwh_Denver]

“Jurors can always violate their oaths, if they have no moral integrity.”

You’re propounding one of the big lies of the powers that be that say there is no jury nullifacation when in fact there is. Jury nullifacation gives citizens a right to say in a jury trial that a law is wrong regardless of whether a person is guilty or not of breaking said law.

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/zenger/nullification.html

[PAR35]

You’re propounding one of the big lies

You have twisted and mis-stated what I have said in order to call me a liar.

You certainly appear to have little enough integrity to ignore any oath you would take as a juror.

[Nomorjer Kinov]

Now you've done it. Notwithstanding an oath you might take to a judge, you have a responsibility as a citizen in some cases, to the integrity of the law, and to resist its perversion.

Article 23 of Maryland’s Constitution states:
In the trial of all criminal cases, the Jury shall be the Judges of Law, as well as of fact, except that the Court may pass upon the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction. The right of trial by Jury of all issues of fact in civil proceedings in the several Courts of Law in this State, where the amount in controversy exceeds the sum of five thousand dollars, shall be inviolably preserved.

Art. 1, Sec. 19, of Indiana’s Constitution says:
In all criminal cases whatever, the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the facts.