What particularly galls me is that the only real information about exactly what was stolen or what the documents contained comes from Berger himself, and yet people find it credible. A man goes through a great deal of trouble to illegally destroy documents, and yet when he says they were "unimportant copies" that's accepted on faith? The "unimportance" of the documents would seem inconsistent with his efforts to destroy them.
Demo-Rats are like an offensive front line in football. They never get blamed for anything.
I have a hard time believing that no one at the National Archives was assisting the effort. The documents were uninventoried and no backup copies were made. That is suspicious too.
On my last visit there, most of the exhibit explanations had liberal stings to them similar to those at the Smithsonian.