To: 2ndDivisionVet
Dobson admits that a third-party plan supported by pro-family leaders might unintentionally help elect . . . Clinton.If Dobson knows this and he does it anyway, then it is intentional and not unintentional.
7 posted on
10/10/2007 3:15:52 PM PDT by
surely_you_jest
(I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. - Will Rogers)
To: surely_you_jest
If Dobson knows this...OK, is there anyone who truly doesn't know this?
It's not like it's political rocket science. (I mean, why do we need such obvious headlines?)
To: surely_you_jest
...does it anyway, then it is intentional and not unintentional.OK. I give up. What is "it?"
To: surely_you_jest
If Dobson knows this and he does it anyway, then it is intentional and not unintentional. That was my thought too.
To: surely_you_jest
If Dobson knows this and he does it anyway, then it is intentional and not unintentional. One can also say that if republicans know this and still force an unacceptable candidate upon us that leads to the election of Hilary then they are doing it intentionally and not unintentionally. Let's have a viable candidate, not someone like Rudy.
167 posted on
10/10/2007 7:22:10 PM PDT by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
To: surely_you_jest
If Dobson knows this and he does it anyway, then it is intentional and not unintentional.Exactly so. I have no idea what this guy is up to but anyone who fails to support the republican candidate, whether Rudy or Mitt or Fred or whoever, is a fraud and an unethical deceiver. Including "doctor" dobson.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson