ELECTABILITY
Howard Dean’s collapse in Iowa in 2004 was due in no small part to widespread concern among Democratic caucus-goers that Dean’s strident anti-Bush and anti-war rhetoric would make him unelectable in November against Bush.
Does electability and the ability to beat Hillary rings a bell regarding a certain frontrunner as an asset?
Also people fundamentally did not trust Dean, they felt Kerry was a much safer pick in the end for America and to win. I'd say that Giuliani has the keep you safe vote pretty locked up.
Now granted Giuliani will have to work hard to bring the conservative base home, but I believe it will come easier to for Rudy to accomplish that, than for Thompson to play catch up. CAMPAIGN ORGANIZATION
He also lost because he almost completely relied on the Internet to organize his campaign. He assumed all those meetups and Internet chats would translate to votes on the cheap. Didn’t happen. You need to have an established campaign with real staff and real money. You need to have a real message anc connect with voters. Dean has a movement not a campaign. I'd say Thompson has more of a movement at this point than a campaign
Again, you see it differently than I do. One of us will be right.
If Rudy turns out to be the nominee, he should pick a hard right VP like Duncan Hunter or Rick Santorium to hold on to the base. Conservatives want to see a strong Conservative set up for the 2016 election. God help us, if he picks McCain. I may even have to vote third party in that case.