Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GM OnStar System Could Halt Stolen Cars
AP ^ | 10/9/07 | TOM KRISHER

Posted on 10/09/2007 8:08:42 PM PDT by Eyes Unclouded

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: Eyes Unclouded
A few months ago, my Brother's beautiful Truck was stolen from the side of his business establishment.

He called On Star and they said they had the vehicle located and it was parked about 20 miles from his place.

On Star would NOT tell him where the truck was located. He had to notify the police and they were instructed to call On Star to get the location information. There are more than a few good reasons why OnStar wants law enforcement involved to retrieve the car.

He got it back.

sw

41 posted on 10/10/2007 5:03:45 AM PDT by spectre (spectre's wife (Susan Estrich, "Hillary sucks all the oxygen out of the room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eyes Unclouded
I don't like the Big Brotherish aspects of what GM has already done with OnStar. Your car is prebugged so police can listen by asking GM, etc. Presently I think GM demands a warrant but they could change their mind. So many corporations today think they're doing the right thing by waiving the BOR on behalf of a third party and not making the government jump through all the hoops the Constitution requires.

Not that I think they'd actually be interested in anything going on in my car, but I don't think it's healthy to let them get into the habit of doing their jobs without crossing every t and dotting every i. Every little bit of empowerment the government gets in domestic law enforcement is a little less power in our hands. That can't be a good thing.

And then to add insult to injury, I think some of these LoJack type services will not tell the subscriber where the transmitter is but will only tell law enforcement. If I wanted to know at all times where my vehicle was, I think I'd get one of the cell phones whose location you can see on the internet and leave it in the car. Then I am in control of the information and can use it or release it as I see fit.

42 posted on 10/10/2007 10:24:03 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

‘And then to add insult to injury, I think some of these LoJack type services will not tell the subscriber where the transmitter is but will only tell law enforcement. ‘

If they did tell its customers where the stolen vehicle could be found, within the first 30 days you’d have a vigilante justice situation, and a mega millions lawsuit against the provider of the lo jack system and the info used by the ‘vigilante’.

They’d be out of their minds to give the location to a customer.


43 posted on 10/10/2007 10:26:20 AM PDT by Badeye (Free Willie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
When insurance companies pay for these features, then I?ll know that they make economic sense.

...for the insurance companies. I've know insurance companies to do perfectly rational things that I wouldn't want them doing to me.

44 posted on 10/10/2007 10:26:44 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

Exactly. Which is why we need to handle the situation without resorting to third parties who might be put in such a quandary. That was what I was saying. I trust that if the most prudent course was calling the cops, that’s what I would do, but after paying for a service it should be my call, not theirs. That was why I was thinking of alternative methods of accomplishing the same thing that empower me rather than the opposite.


45 posted on 10/10/2007 10:34:42 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

There are GPS trackers available for you to purchase that will give you the option. Private Investigators use them all the time for domestic investigations.


46 posted on 10/10/2007 10:36:47 AM PDT by Badeye (Free Willie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
Zactly the type of thing I was thinking of if. And if you pay in cash for the device and a couple years in advance for the service, no one can use it against you.

I realize I probably sound paranoid, but I haven't gone out and bought anything to track my car. It's just that it seems like our privacy and our personal control over our lives is being relentlessly chipped away, and I feel like we should be alert to stop as many of those encroachments as we can in advance, and look for ways to keep as much control as we can to ourselves, as a principle, and defy and foil those who would do the chipping.

47 posted on 10/10/2007 10:41:50 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

I know what you mean, its one of the many reasons we moved out of the city and into the rural area we live in today.

Out here in the Appalachian Zone, if you don’t shoot the intruder/car thief, they think your stupid....(chuckle)


48 posted on 10/10/2007 10:44:33 AM PDT by Badeye (Free Willie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Eyes Unclouded
If it spreads, the technology could make dangerous police chases a thing of the past.

Then what would become of all the TV station helicopter pilots in California. They would be out of a job. ;~))

49 posted on 10/10/2007 10:46:58 AM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eyes Unclouded
I see no privacy issues or safety problems with this at all.

It seems to be entirely voluntary. The purchaser would have to weigh these issues against the real possibility of significant insurance savings. Also the safety benefits of having and not having the system would have to be compared.

But again...its entirely voluntary.

50 posted on 10/10/2007 10:50:55 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spectre; Still Thinking

Yea can imagine stalkers misusing the data


51 posted on 10/10/2007 1:36:14 PM PDT by Eyes Unclouded (We won't ever free our guns but be sure we'll let them triggers go....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

A radio changeout will not disable onstar for tracking purposes , it just disables the 2 way communication ,,, on most (if not all) OnStar equipped vehicles the microphone is located on the radio’s faceplate and when they talk back it is routed through the radios speakers ... replacing the radio eliminates the possibility of you being listened in on which would be a plus if you ran a waste disposal company (they can turn on the comm feature without lighting up the red led that indicates a conversation in progress)but the GPS tracking features remain (and remote door unlock etc. etc. etc.),,, when I said OnStar could be disabled in seconds I was referring to cutting the antenna cable that it uses to communicate with.


52 posted on 10/10/2007 1:42:54 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Eyes Unclouded

Why bother with all that rigamorole? Just assess fines, points against DL automagically to the registered owners’ DL, and shoot the info to the insurance company. Then send the ticket in the mail.


53 posted on 10/10/2007 1:44:42 PM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US
Why even mail it? Just charge the person direct from the bank or credit card number ... or RealID number once that comes about. It’s a good thing that this technology is fool proof and offers no chance of abuse. Also when the police need to find someone they can just power this up right away!
54 posted on 10/10/2007 4:08:10 PM PDT by Eyes Unclouded (We won't ever free our guns but be sure we'll let them triggers go....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US
Why even mail it? Just charge the person direct from the bank or credit card number ... or RealID number once that comes about. It’s a good thing that this technology is fool proof and offers no chance of abuse. Also when the police need to find someone they can just power this up right away!
55 posted on 10/10/2007 4:08:31 PM PDT by Eyes Unclouded (We won't ever free our guns but be sure we'll let them triggers go....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

LOL! You are right about them wanting to pull us over. That gives them that power rush over us ordinary “citizens.”


56 posted on 10/10/2007 4:16:37 PM PDT by JSteff (Reality= realizing you are not nearly important enough for the government to tap your phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ken21

“an illegal called me to tell me where it was located”

Wow... did he call you and say “hi, my name is xxxxx, and I’m an illegal alien. I found your car and it is behind the apartment building at 240 Race Street?”


57 posted on 10/16/2007 7:02:25 AM PDT by eraser2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: eraser2005

i surmised he was illegal because he would not come forward to meet the police. he lived in an area populated by illegals.

from the beginning: he called me and spoke in broken english, difficult to understand, to say that he knew where my car was.

i thought he was trying to hit me up for money at first, but he persisted.

i telephoned the police because they said not to go near the car before they investigated.

a friend drove me over to the street that he’d mentioned. we found two police cars looking for my vehicle. all three of us struck out. i identified myself to a sargeant and he suggested that i call the telephone number of the informer.

since i didn’t understand the informer’s english, i handed my cell phone to the sargeant; he spoke spanish to him, identifying himself as “policia”. the guy gave more exact details.

it turned out my car was abandoned behind an apartment building. a junior officer finger printed my car with no results and after filling out a form, gave me access to my stuff—strewn out across the parking lot.

meanwhile, the sargeant ticketed and towed five vehicles in the apartment parking lot. the place was a dump. it looked like tj.

a crowd of illegals gathered to look on, peering around the end of the building. one middle aged guy caught my attention; he kept smiling at me. i surmised that he was the informant.

i gladly drove my car out. fortunately it was undamaged.


58 posted on 10/16/2007 7:13:20 PM PDT by ken21 ( people die + you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson